114
$\begingroup$

Does outgoing moderator Anton Geraschenko deserve our heartfelt thanks, or what?

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Asaf already expressed this sentiment in a separate meta post (meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/1040), but I thought it deserved its own "question". $\endgroup$ – Tom Leinster Oct 16 '13 at 20:35
  • 45
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the thanks! I wouldn't be as outgoing as I am were it not for the MO community. $\endgroup$ – Anton Geraschenko Oct 16 '13 at 20:51
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ I had told Anton a few months back that I'd like to buy him a drink or two should I chance to meet him, but I think he's gotten more such offers than would be good for his mathematics! But indeed, the community is hugely in debt to him. $\endgroup$ – Todd Trimble Oct 16 '13 at 23:31
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @ToddTrimble: btw, now that you have a ♦, you can edit your comment even after 5 minutes have passed. $\endgroup$ – Anton Geraschenko Oct 17 '13 at 1:20
  • $\begingroup$ @AntonGeraschenko Ha! Thanks. $\endgroup$ – Todd Trimble Oct 17 '13 at 1:58
  • 19
    $\begingroup$ @AntonGeraschenko, that is almost the whole point of being a mod! :-) $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Oct 17 '13 at 7:08
81
$\begingroup$

I think the answer is ... yes.

$\endgroup$
  • 15
    $\begingroup$ This tempts me to post an offsetting answer of "no" for purposes of liquidity- I'm prevented from doing so by impossibility of downvoting my own post. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Moskovich Oct 17 '13 at 2:39
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ @DanielMoskovich no worries, I'd be happy to downvote your answer for you :) $\endgroup$ – Vidit Nanda Oct 18 '13 at 15:12
-39
$\begingroup$

For the purpose of offering an offsetting position:

NO

$\endgroup$
  • 15
    $\begingroup$ Now I'm tempted to post an answer "For the purposes of modality... Maybe!" :-) $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Oct 19 '13 at 16:56
  • $\begingroup$ How about "I don't know" or "No opinion"? :) $\endgroup$ – Joel Reyes Noche Oct 20 '13 at 0:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Asaf: as there are more upvotes on the Yes answer than this one, we can (by Mathematician Logic (TM)) conclude that about 60% of MO users do not believe in the law of excluded middle. $\endgroup$ – Willie Wong Oct 22 '13 at 14:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Willie: That's not Mathematical Logic (TM). It's statistics, which as D'Israeli said, is the worst kind of a lie! $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Oct 22 '13 at 15:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Asaf: not "Mathematical Logic", "Mathematician Logic" $\endgroup$ – Willie Wong Oct 22 '13 at 15:05
  • $\begingroup$ @Willie: The eyes see, but the mind reads. ;-) $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Oct 22 '13 at 15:08
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ It's one thing to think A deserves a vote up and another to think that not-A deserves a vote down. Maybe a vote up means that an answer is reasonable, and a vote down means that an answer is unreasonable. But certainly there are many debates where one can think A is a reasonable opinion without thinking that not-A is an unreasonable opinion. :-) $\endgroup$ – Alexander Pruss Oct 30 '13 at 19:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .