Timeline for Anton's departure as moderator
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2013 at 19:05 | comment | added | Alexander Pruss | It's one thing to think A deserves a vote up and another to think that not-A deserves a vote down. Maybe a vote up means that an answer is reasonable, and a vote down means that an answer is unreasonable. But certainly there are many debates where one can think A is a reasonable opinion without thinking that not-A is an unreasonable opinion. :-) | |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 15:08 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila Mod | @Willie: The eyes see, but the mind reads. ;-) | |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 15:05 | comment | added | Willie Wong | @Asaf: not "Mathematical Logic", "Mathematician Logic" | |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 15:02 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila Mod | @Willie: That's not Mathematical Logic (TM). It's statistics, which as D'Israeli said, is the worst kind of a lie! | |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 14:57 | comment | added | Willie Wong | @Asaf: as there are more upvotes on the Yes answer than this one, we can (by Mathematician Logic (TM)) conclude that about 60% of MO users do not believe in the law of excluded middle. | |
| Oct 20, 2013 at 0:32 | comment | added | JRN | How about "I don't know" or "No opinion"? :) | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 16:56 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila Mod | Now I'm tempted to post an answer "For the purposes of modality... Maybe!" :-) | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 16:26 | history | undeleted | Daniel Moskovich | ||
| Oct 19, 2013 at 16:26 | history | edited | Daniel Moskovich | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 9 characters in body
|
| Oct 17, 2013 at 2:38 | history | deleted | Daniel Moskovich | via Vote | |
| Oct 17, 2013 at 2:30 | history | answered | Daniel Moskovich | CC BY-SA 3.0 |