114
$\begingroup$

Does outgoing moderator Anton Geraschenko deserve our heartfelt thanks, or what?

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Asaf already expressed this sentiment in a separate meta post (meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/1040), but I thought it deserved its own "question". $\endgroup$ – Tom Leinster Oct 16 '13 at 20:35
  • 45
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the thanks! I wouldn't be as outgoing as I am were it not for the MO community. $\endgroup$ – Anton Geraschenko Oct 16 '13 at 20:51
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ I had told Anton a few months back that I'd like to buy him a drink or two should I chance to meet him, but I think he's gotten more such offers than would be good for his mathematics! But indeed, the community is hugely in debt to him. $\endgroup$ – Todd Trimble Oct 16 '13 at 23:31
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @ToddTrimble: btw, now that you have a ♦, you can edit your comment even after 5 minutes have passed. $\endgroup$ – Anton Geraschenko Oct 17 '13 at 1:20
  • $\begingroup$ @AntonGeraschenko Ha! Thanks. $\endgroup$ – Todd Trimble Oct 17 '13 at 1:58
  • 19
    $\begingroup$ @AntonGeraschenko, that is almost the whole point of being a mod! :-) $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Oct 17 '13 at 7:08
81
$\begingroup$

I think the answer is ... yes.

$\endgroup$
  • 15
    $\begingroup$ This tempts me to post an offsetting answer of "no" for purposes of liquidity- I'm prevented from doing so by impossibility of downvoting my own post. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Moskovich Oct 17 '13 at 2:39
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ @DanielMoskovich no worries, I'd be happy to downvote your answer for you :) $\endgroup$ – Vidit Nanda Oct 18 '13 at 15:12
-39
$\begingroup$

For the purpose of offering an offsetting position:

NO

$\endgroup$
  • 15
    $\begingroup$ Now I'm tempted to post an answer "For the purposes of modality... Maybe!" :-) $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Oct 19 '13 at 16:56
  • $\begingroup$ How about "I don't know" or "No opinion"? :) $\endgroup$ – Joel Reyes Noche Oct 20 '13 at 0:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Asaf: as there are more upvotes on the Yes answer than this one, we can (by Mathematician Logic (TM)) conclude that about 60% of MO users do not believe in the law of excluded middle. $\endgroup$ – Willie Wong Oct 22 '13 at 14:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Willie: That's not Mathematical Logic (TM). It's statistics, which as D'Israeli said, is the worst kind of a lie! $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Oct 22 '13 at 15:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Asaf: not "Mathematical Logic", "Mathematician Logic" $\endgroup$ – Willie Wong Oct 22 '13 at 15:05
  • $\begingroup$ @Willie: The eyes see, but the mind reads. ;-) $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Oct 22 '13 at 15:08
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ It's one thing to think A deserves a vote up and another to think that not-A deserves a vote down. Maybe a vote up means that an answer is reasonable, and a vote down means that an answer is unreasonable. But certainly there are many debates where one can think A is a reasonable opinion without thinking that not-A is an unreasonable opinion. :-) $\endgroup$ – Alexander Pruss Oct 30 '13 at 19:05

You must log in to answer this question.

protected by François G. Dorais May 20 '15 at 6:34

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .