Timeline for Protest for my account suspension [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2021 at 6:17 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| May 26, 2021 at 3:01 | |||||
| May 9, 2021 at 11:10 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | A recent question on this topic: Is there any process to appeal bans? | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Oct 21, 2013 at 4:13 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Oct 25, 2013 at 0:18 | |||||
| Oct 21, 2013 at 3:56 | history | edited | Adam LearStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 19 characters in body
|
| Oct 20, 2013 at 0:15 | history | closed |
Andrés E. Caicedo Andy Putman Daniel Moskovich j.c. Felipe Voloch |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 22:22 | comment | added | Andy Putman | @MakotoKato : I will not respond further, but given that no one but you seems to think that your suspension was unjust, you should probably rethink your position here. And wasting everyone's time by whining about it over and over again is not going to help you. | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 21:43 | comment | added | user9072 | @ToddTrimble thanks for letting me know, this explains it, I assume. (I'd still maintain the "more generally" in abstract, but this is a bit off-topic here.) | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 20:10 | comment | added | Todd Trimble Mod | @quid To answer the question in your first comment, I can confirm that a lot was deleted. Whole posts were deleted, and in posts that remained alive there were a lot of comments deleted by mods (and some by the owners as well). So there is some history that you (even with your detailed knowledge of MO and meta, which I've always found impressive) might not be able to see -- I'll leave it at that. | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 13:18 | comment | added | Daniel Moskovich | @Makoto Kato: I'm sorry for my rudeness, but I would like to suggest that you not protest the suspension. Instead use the suspension as an opportunity to learn how to use this site more productively! There was a problem, and you've received a gift of a few days to think things over and to overcome the problem. It's a learning opportunity, not a punishment :-) . Limit yourself to 2-3 comments per comment thread at most, for instance, and you'll find yourself better received, and you'll get more out of the site. | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 11:28 | comment | added | user9072 | @AsafKaragila I feel I am somewhat familiar with the math.SE history related to this, and for the more recent one [specfically for the relevant time span in this case, so around august] I feel rather well-informed (and oberserved the behavior I described, too). Maybe that I said 'a main problem' is too strong, but it is at least part of the problems, and also a problem, one that does not get address much (as far as I can tell). | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 11:22 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila Mod | @quid: I don't know how well versed you are in the history of this user's behavior. But my experience tells me that "more generally" does not (in general) apply. | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 9:15 | comment | added | user9072 | More generally, as in various cases of so-called "problematic" users a main problem in my opinion is with "mainstream users" (for lack of a better word) that for some reason [pseudo-psychological commentary surpressed] provoke the user. | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 9:10 | comment | added | Makoto Kato | @AndyPutman Do you think I should be silent even if I was suspended wrongly? This is a democratic community, isn't it? | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 9:08 | comment | added | user9072 | While I agree that OP's insistance can get annoying, I have to say that given the linked thread and me being unable to find any other recent long comment thread on main (was something deleted?) I've some sympathy for OP's surprise. He was greeted by an unjustified accusation (OP was active on MO before so it isn't clear he's using MO to circumvent any suspension, and even if so people's opinion on this is off-topic for main). Then, was encouraged by a moderator to provide details continuing on a/the meta debate, which were dilligently supplied, just to receive hostile comments by somebody. | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 8:50 | answer | added | Martin Sleziak | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 5:39 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 20, 2013 at 0:19 | |||||
| Oct 19, 2013 at 5:30 | comment | added | Andy Putman | How many times now have you complained about this on meta? It's getting annoying. Please stop. | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 5:11 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Mod | Suspensions are not really up for debate and, moreover, the message you got with the suspensión is amply clear of the reasons behind it. On top of that, there is no reason why behaviour on MSE should not be taken into account here. In all, I can't see the point of this post except for reinforcing the points made by the mod in that message. | |
| Oct 19, 2013 at 5:00 | history | asked | Makoto Kato | CC BY-SA 3.0 |