12

The review system is not meant for finding posts that contain bad math, or that are just wrong. First posts are in the review queue because they are much more likely to be from a user that doesn't understand how this site works yet and e.g. posts a comment or other non-answer as an answer. Spammers or other users that vandalize the site are also usually ...


8

Moderators see spam flags in the flag queue, and they can delete a post with a single spam flag. They can also destroy a user with a few clicks, which will remove all their posts as well as their account, and eventually block the user on the whole SE network. Of course a moderator needs to be awake and looking at the flag queue to notice the spam flags, ...


6

Originally, there was no "No action needed" button in this queue. There were actions, and then there was "Skip". If you couldn't see your way to performing some sort of action (either because you didn't understand the topic, or just couldn't think of anything useful to do), then you were expected to skip it. Folks didn't. So... We added the extra button ...


5

That would be my fault. Late answers are only enqueued if the author has no more than a certain reputation level. Today, I raised that limit from 10 to 50. My intention was to add a minimal number of reviews. But I didn't account for the backlog of late answers that would be added to each and every site on the network. (Truthfully, I misread the code.) Now ...


4

This seems to be status-completed See Can flags send a post into the Low Quality Posts review queue?


1

It seems that the new responsive design has fixed this issue:


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible