Timeline for OpenAI and MathOverflow?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 13 at 12:01 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 18 at 3:19 | |||||
Jun 9 at 23:04 | history | edited | Sam Hopkins |
edited tags
|
|
May 20 at 12:57 | vote | accept | J.J. Green | ||
May 18 at 2:11 | answer | added | Ben WebsterMod | timeline score: 16 | |
May 13 at 4:44 | comment | added | Alec Rhea | I think 'plan' is putting the cart before the horse; as far as I can tell, we're all just getting up to speed on this AI agreement business -- consequently, I doubt there are any 'plans' as such one way or another. If you mean to ask if it's possible we'll end up doing something like that in the future I think that's a good question; I would personally be against it, but can't speak for the community at large. | |
May 12 at 12:55 | comment | added | J.J. Green | @DavidRoberts -- I mean establish some agreement with an AI company to monetise the site's question and answers. It is my understanding that MO is independent of SE (though using the same site software and user licence), if that was mistaken then this question is moot of course. | |
May 12 at 11:45 | comment | added | Federico Poloni | It is not clear from the announcements if the agreement covers only Stack Overflow the website, or the whole Stack Exchange network, including MO. I guess the question if we 'plan to follow' assumes the first scenario. | |
May 12 at 8:19 | comment | added | Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine | Also related: meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/5669/… | |
May 12 at 7:54 | comment | added | David Roberts Mod | What do you mean by 'follow'? | |
May 11 at 21:13 | history | became hot meta post | |||
May 11 at 15:15 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | Related - to some extent: How do we fit in with Stack Exchange’s new AI agreement with Google? | |
May 11 at 10:49 | history | asked | J.J. Green | CC BY-SA 4.0 |