Timeline for Spam / Crank users
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2019 at 11:42 | comment | added | Joseph Van Name | "RH, the Goldbach conjecture, the abc conjecture, and sometimes primality testing"-What about reversible and quantum computing? | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 22, 2014 at 18:59 | comment | added | Todd Trimble Mod | @JoonasIlmavirta Thanks; I've already been considering doing that. | |
| Dec 22, 2014 at 18:57 | comment | added | Joonas Ilmavirta | @ToddTrimble, if you want no one to even comment at his posts, you should make this announcement more visible at meta. A new post with a title about such a request might work better than this one, and it would be easy to bump it to remind people when the user returns. | |
| Dec 22, 2014 at 18:44 | history | edited | Todd TrimbleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 873 characters in body
|
| Nov 15, 2014 at 11:35 | comment | added | Todd Trimble Mod | @Kaveh They all know all about him, and they have their methods. | |
| Nov 15, 2014 at 8:08 | comment | added | Kaveh | @Todd, you may want o contact SE, they might be able to blacklist the user. | |
| Oct 27, 2014 at 13:11 | comment | added | Todd Trimble Mod | @EmilJeřábek No, you are absolutely not adding to the workload; all such flags are very useful to us. The vast majority of flags I process are deemed 'helpful'. | |
| Oct 27, 2014 at 12:33 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | Since the moderators are already closely watching this user, I wonder if flagging his posts on sight is actually useful, or if I’m just adding to your workload? | |
| Oct 26, 2014 at 23:47 | vote | accept | martin | ||
| Oct 26, 2014 at 21:25 | comment | added | martin | OK thanks for your help - will do. | |
| Oct 26, 2014 at 21:23 | comment | added | Todd Trimble Mod | @martin You shouldn't have to worry about using the venerable name Riemann, which should be open to all responsible users. Please feel free to flag to place a question under protection if you find you accidentally attracted the attention of a spammer. | |
| Oct 26, 2014 at 21:20 | comment | added | martin | Thank you for the action you took! As I said to JoonasI lmavirta above, I will certainly think twice about tagging a question "Riemann Zeta Function" in future! | |
| Oct 26, 2014 at 21:18 | history | answered | Todd TrimbleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |