Skip to main content

Timeline for Spam / Crank users

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:25 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.mathoverflow.net/ with https://meta.mathoverflow.net/
Nov 7, 2014 at 11:39 comment added martin @IncnisMrsi please see update
Nov 7, 2014 at 11:39 history edited martin CC BY-SA 3.0
added 595 characters in body
Nov 7, 2014 at 10:50 comment added Incnis Mrsi The link under “same answer” rotted. Explicate the problem, please.
Oct 26, 2014 at 23:47 vote accept martin
Oct 26, 2014 at 22:30 comment added martin @quid ok - at least that gives a little peace of mind then!
Oct 26, 2014 at 21:55 comment added user9072 On your side question: new users cannot vote at all (needs 15 points), and for downvoting one need 125 points even see mathoverflow.net/help/privileges Furthermore, unregistered users cannot vote either (not sure they were unregistered but it is not rarely the case for such type of users).
Oct 26, 2014 at 21:18 answer added Todd TrimbleMod timeline score: 24
Oct 26, 2014 at 21:17 comment added martin @JoonasIlmavirta Yes, I will certainly think twice about tagging a question "Riemann Zeta Function" in future!
Oct 26, 2014 at 21:10 comment added Joonas Ilmavirta If a crank wants to continue "contributing" to MO, they will probably find their way back. And if they don't, a colleague will. Although there will be a more or less constant flux of cranks, there is a good chance that they will no longer find your question when it gets old enough. If they don't, the question can be protected. I strongly believe that the junk is not targeted at you but at questions related to a famous open problem.
Oct 26, 2014 at 20:11 comment added martin @StefanKohl OK thanks.
Oct 26, 2014 at 20:10 comment added Stefan Kohl Mod I think this would be something to decide for the moderators or the SE staff.
Oct 26, 2014 at 20:09 comment added martin @StefanKohl OK thanks - I wondered if something could be done on the IP front. What would you say is best to do in the meantime - just leave it if (when!) it happens again?
Oct 26, 2014 at 20:08 comment added Stefan Kohl Mod Presumably the same person has posted also a lot of other junk, so it doesn't seem this is targeted at you. I think this would be a case for blocking the offender's IP number(s). By the way, downvoting requires 125 points -- see mathoverflow.net/help/privileges.
Oct 26, 2014 at 19:24 history asked martin CC BY-SA 3.0