comment
Deletion of on-topic comment threads
My own attitude has been to be relaxed about comments if there is a real mathematical (and collegial, cordial) conversation going on, but to move chat threads when they become contentious or go off the topic rails. I tend to agree with the idea that MO is somewhat sui generis among SE sites, and not all the "usual SE rules" need be followed to the letter.
comment
What do moderators do these days?
Honestly, Tim, my impression is that you would make a very good MO moderator. Please consider this!
awarded
awarded
awarded
Loading…
comment
2021 Moderator election: suggestions for nominees?
@FrançoisG.Dorais They saw it.
awarded
comment
2021 Moderator election: suggestions for nominees?
I also thought there were reasons I shouldn't run back in 2013, but some people changed my mind about this. I hope you'll reconsider.
Loading…
comment
Removing "tag-removed" tag
Please feel free to bring to attention (however you wish) misapplied tags.
comment
Migration from mathoverflow to other stackexchange sites
No, among community-based reasons, it's just this, or "This question does not appear to be about research level mathematics within the scope defined in the help center", or a custom-built reason (user-specified). The other reasons to close are duplicate, needs clarity or focus, needs more details, and opinion-based. That's it. Might you be thinking of a different site?
comment
Migration from mathoverflow to other stackexchange sites
What do you mean, no explicit reference to MSE? It's there in the closure announcement. Perhaps you mean to change the message in that announcement?
comment
Requests for reopen and undelete votes for closed and deleted questions
I have responded here: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/56897449#56897449 I understand why the situation seems confusing, but it was not deleted by mistake, and there was nothing sinister going on. The other moderators can see what happened as well.
comment
MathOverflow policymaking and transparency
Let's just try to keep things constructive. Your answer under Martin Sleziak's recent meta post is much better.
comment
MathOverflow policymaking and transparency
Harry, could you please not kick up even more dust by painting moderators as taking unreasonable actions in other cases and anticipating things getting "even worse"? This is not something to be discussed in these damned comment boxes, and it's really off-topic (relative to the current thread). The whole MS saga is not to be rehashed and relitigated here.
awarded
comment
MathOverflow policymaking and transparency
@Lucia (and David Roberts): yes. We have this very much in mind as well, although I won't name specific names.
comment
MathOverflow policymaking and transparency
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
comment
MathOverflow policymaking and transparency
Harry, I think it painted a very misleading picture. While I am not privy to any of the discussions Ravi has had with various people over the years, I think it's jumping to conclusions that there were groups approaching him and seeking to set policy. My guess it was more private individuals occasionally relaying concerns, or something. Maybe you could ask him. What I can say is that there have been no such groups contacting the moderators. Or at least I'm not aware of any such (and I think I'd know).