Timeline for Editing a question admitting a trivial example
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2018 at 20:47 | answer | added | Paul Siegel | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 12, 2018 at 17:04 | answer | added | Pietro Majer | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 9, 2018 at 13:51 | answer | added | YCor | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 16:32 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | Also, I would keep this meta question, and its links to the others, to make it easier for a future reader to encounter this issue and its variations. Gerhard "Changes On A Meta Level" Paseman, 2018.03.06. | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 16:30 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | I think a small amount of redundancy (coupled with a fresh perspective) is important. I would suggest editing to link the question to related questions. You might highlight the answer given to the earlier version, crediting it instead of dismissing it. Gerhard "Variations Upon A Mathematical Theme" Paseman, 2018.03.06. | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 14:05 | comment | added | Dominic van der Zypen | Thanks Martin - I guess I should delete this question in order not to clutter meta.MO, if you agree? | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 13:56 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | Probably this discussion is the closest to your question I am able to find: Questions with “accidental” trivial answers. However, it is from Mathematics Meta - which is a different site (although the overlap between the users is quite substantial). | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 13:51 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | There are a few related threads on this meta (and many more on other metas). For example, Change a question after counter example or Altering the question in a way that makes an answer obsolete and other posts linked there. | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 13:29 | history | asked | Dominic van der Zypen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |