Timeline for Mixed reviews - can I have a decision reversed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2019 at 0:45 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 19, 2019 at 3:15 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Jan 24, 2016 at 15:38 | history | edited | user9072 |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 24, 2016 at 14:44 | comment | added | Todd Trimble Mod | Jon, you might be right and I might be wrong. But I didn't think that's where the OP was coming from: trying to jack up book sales. If that's what I thought, I would have accepted the flag. (If it helps, I hesitated before processing the flag that way; it wasn't an absolutely clear-cut call to me.) | |
| Jan 24, 2016 at 14:38 | comment | added | JMP | to me the post was nothing more than a link to a book for sale, i.e. an advert, but i'm new to this, if these are acceptable i'll bear this in mind | |
| Jan 24, 2016 at 14:36 | comment | added | Todd Trimble Mod | Having written my answer, I guess my main message, looking to the future, is "please flag accurately". Perhaps here it just comes down to differences in how one interprets the word 'spam'. I think some users interpret it overly broadly. | |
| Jan 24, 2016 at 14:26 | answer | added | Todd TrimbleMod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jan 24, 2016 at 13:41 | history | edited | JMP | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added better question
|
| Jan 24, 2016 at 13:39 | comment | added | François G. Dorais Mod | I'm not exactly sure what you're asking for, especially since you deliberately avoid asking a question. In case my guess is correct: no, we can't "undecline" flags. | |
| Jan 24, 2016 at 13:33 | history | edited | François G. DoraisMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 24, 2016 at 13:31 | history | asked | JMP | CC BY-SA 3.0 |