Timeline for Questions about applied mathematics
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 23, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:53 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://scicomp.stackexchange.com/ with https://scicomp.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Jan 21, 2014 at 10:13 | comment | added | Dirk | This recent question is a good counterexample to my point. | |
Jan 10, 2014 at 8:42 | comment | added | Dirk | for questions on an application that need somehow broader expertise I would also consider MO. | |
Jan 10, 2014 at 8:41 | comment | added | Dirk | @GilKalai I partly agree. In applied math research one sometimes needs mathematical advice on tools that one wants to use (e.g. Which iterative method will perform best on this huge linear system? What pitfalls are there when I set up finite elements for this coupled system of PDEs?). Well, these question are about research but I have the feeling that I will get better answers on scicomp (in these examples) than here. Also, other users of scicomp may also find these questions/answers a useful resource. So my questions on computational tools would go to scicomp while (cont.) | |
Jan 10, 2014 at 6:48 | comment | added | Gil Kalai | Hi Dirk, Having other sites in the stackexchange netwerk that can be relevant to a good research-level question should not be a consideration by us. Also, since MO is, by a good margin, higher research-quality site than others, if you want to get an answer also for an interdiciplinary question, asking on MO can be a good strategy. | |
Jan 7, 2014 at 21:57 | comment | added | Todd Trimble Mod | +1 I'm very glad to have your take on this, Dirk. | |
Jan 7, 2014 at 21:35 | history | answered | Dirk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |