comment
Undelete request, Question 67384
Meanwhile, the link in a comment is outdated. The current version should be nieuwarchief.nl/serie5/pdf/naw5-2000-01-4-372.pdf
comment
Usefulness of longer tags
Why do we need a length limit?
awarded
awarded
comment
Undelete request, question 23943
@FrançoisG.Dorais Done.
answered
Loading…
asked
Loading…
comment
Undelete request, question 23943
@FrançoisG.Dorais You mean: Even though you are already aware of it (and my comments on the matter can be seen as a formal request), you still need that I write a new thread for it, and have quid comment on it, and all that?
comment
Undelete request, question 23943
As I mentioned before, I believe undeleting the other answers deleted by the same user would be a benefit to the community, and the moderators could just do it without waiting for 10K+ people to chance upon them and start a request.
comment
When a MSE user is suspended, should the suspension apply to MO as well?
If the suspension is due to outrageous disruptive behavior, I am not sure it makes sense to wait for such behavior to happen here as well before doing anything. (You can replace "outrageous disruptive behavior" with whatever you prefer, I will not be elaborating on this for now.)
revised
Requests for reopen and undelete votes for closed and deleted questions
added 15 characters in body
Loading…
comment
Tags that encourage off-topic questions
Eliminate "calculus", there are obvious alternatives. "Linear algebra", on the other hand, seems useful, even if it attracts some noise.
comment
Editing titles to include $\mathfrak{LaTeX \; Math}$
The point with the thread in question was that this was not really a good improvement, however well intentioned. Instead, it added noise (in the form of a clash of notation).
comment
Users with multiple accounts
Thanks, @FrançoisG.Dorais!
comment
Users with multiple accounts
While we are at it, is there a way to search for users with unregistered accounts? Typing the user name does not return anything.
Loading…
comment
Do we have an unofficial quota on how many old questions one should bump for minor edits in a single day?
These are needed edits. It would be nice if they could be done automatically. Since that does not seem to be the case, this seems the best solution we currently have.
comment
Editing titles to include $\mathfrak{LaTeX \; Math}$
@BenjaminSteinberg Don't know. That may be a useful alternative.
comment
Editing titles to include $\mathfrak{LaTeX \; Math}$
Since $R^4$ is used in the body of the question, I believe here the intention was to replace R^4 with $R^4$. This being too small an edit, additional characters had to be added and R^4 became $\mathbb R^4$. The point is that it was too small an edit. I really don't see what the point of editing this was to begin with.
comment
Editing titles to include $\mathfrak{LaTeX \; Math}$
I rejected the edit, as too minor, but so it goes. Ridiculous that the body of the question, where R^4 was also used in many places, was not touched. If one is to make an edit on this question, the reasonable thing is to edit it fully, adding latex everywhere it is missing, and being consistent with the use of notation. (I do not have time for that right now, as it turns out, so I am not going to "improve it".)