Timeline for Appropriate Reaction to a Failed Reference Request on MO
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.mathoverflow.net/ with https://meta.mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Dec 30, 2013 at 0:38 | answer | added | The Masked Avenger | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 5, 2013 at 13:05 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | Yes. It is unreasonable to enter in an MO window a text which is longer than 1 page. | |
| Sep 5, 2013 at 5:50 | comment | added | Manfred Weis | @AlexandreEremenko: what you propose is exactly option 1; or did you mean that I should publish a more elaborate version elsewhere and a 'compact' version on MO first and later add the pointer to the article? – | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 20:01 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | Why don't you just do both things, 1 and 2, if you feel that the result is worth publishing ? If the proof is too long, you can answer in MO with a reference to your preprint. | |
| Aug 30, 2013 at 17:07 | vote | accept | Manfred Weis | ||
| Aug 30, 2013 at 15:34 | answer | added | David White | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 30, 2013 at 13:29 | history | asked | Manfred Weis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |