Skip to main content
Kan, not Kahn! (Nor Khan :))
Source Link
Denis Nardin
  • 16.5k
  • 14
  • 12

I think neither "simplices" nor "simplex-theory" captures the topic that is currently described by "simplicial-stuff". If we want to rename it, maybe "simplicial-objects"? (even if taken literally is a bit more restrictive). I like a lot "simplicial-stuff" though, and I'd prefer to keep it. I don't think any name that we come up with is going to avoid well-intentioned people from using the tag to describe combinatorial questions about simplices.

That said, I think a tag-excerpt should definitely be added. What about the following variation on the math.stackexchange tag-excerpt?

For questions about simplicial sets, simplicial (co)algebras and simplicial objects in other categories; geometric realization, Dold-KahnKan correspondence, simplicial resolutions etc.

(I removed model structures from the description because we already have a tag for those, . Moreover they are a different topic, and they deserve a different tag.)

I think neither "simplices" nor "simplex-theory" captures the topic that is currently described by "simplicial-stuff". If we want to rename it, maybe "simplicial-objects"? (even if taken literally is a bit more restrictive). I like a lot "simplicial-stuff" though, and I'd prefer to keep it. I don't think any name that we come up with is going to avoid well-intentioned people from using the tag to describe combinatorial questions about simplices.

That said, I think a tag-excerpt should definitely be added. What about the following variation on the math.stackexchange tag-excerpt?

For questions about simplicial sets, simplicial (co)algebras and simplicial objects in other categories; geometric realization, Dold-Kahn correspondence, simplicial resolutions etc.

(I removed model structures from the description because we already have a tag for those, . Moreover they are a different topic, and they deserve a different tag.)

I think neither "simplices" nor "simplex-theory" captures the topic that is currently described by "simplicial-stuff". If we want to rename it, maybe "simplicial-objects"? (even if taken literally is a bit more restrictive). I like a lot "simplicial-stuff" though, and I'd prefer to keep it. I don't think any name that we come up with is going to avoid well-intentioned people from using the tag to describe combinatorial questions about simplices.

That said, I think a tag-excerpt should definitely be added. What about the following variation on the math.stackexchange tag-excerpt?

For questions about simplicial sets, simplicial (co)algebras and simplicial objects in other categories; geometric realization, Dold-Kan correspondence, simplicial resolutions etc.

(I removed model structures from the description because we already have a tag for those, . Moreover they are a different topic, and they deserve a different tag.)

Add stuff
Source Link
Denis Nardin
  • 16.5k
  • 14
  • 12

I think neither "simplices" nor "simplex-theory" captures the topic that is currently described by "simplicial-stuff". If we want to rename it, maybe "simplicial-objects"? (even if taken literally is a bit more restrictive). I like a lot "simplicial-stuff" though, and I'd prefer to keep it. I don't think any name that we come up with is going to avoid well-intentioned people from using the tag to describe combinatorial questions about simplices.

That said, I think a tag-excerpt should definitely be added. What about the following variation on the math.stackexchange tag-excerpt?

For questions about simplicial sets, simplicial (co)algebras and simplicial objects in other categories; geometric realization, Dold-Kahn correspondence, simplicial resolutions etc.

(I removed model structures from the description because we already have a tag for those, . Moreover they are a different topic, and they deserve a different tag.)

I think neither "simplices" nor "simplex-theory" captures the topic that is currently described by "simplicial-stuff". If we want to rename it, maybe "simplicial-objects"? (even if taken literally is a bit more restrictive). I like a lot "simplicial-stuff" though, and I'd prefer to keep it.

That said, I think a tag-excerpt should definitely be added. What about the following variation on the math.stackexchange tag-excerpt?

For questions about simplicial sets, simplicial (co)algebras and simplicial objects in other categories; geometric realization, Dold-Kahn correspondence, simplicial resolutions etc.

(I removed model structures from the description because we already have a tag for those)

I think neither "simplices" nor "simplex-theory" captures the topic that is currently described by "simplicial-stuff". If we want to rename it, maybe "simplicial-objects"? (even if taken literally is a bit more restrictive). I like a lot "simplicial-stuff" though, and I'd prefer to keep it. I don't think any name that we come up with is going to avoid well-intentioned people from using the tag to describe combinatorial questions about simplices.

That said, I think a tag-excerpt should definitely be added. What about the following variation on the math.stackexchange tag-excerpt?

For questions about simplicial sets, simplicial (co)algebras and simplicial objects in other categories; geometric realization, Dold-Kahn correspondence, simplicial resolutions etc.

(I removed model structures from the description because we already have a tag for those, . Moreover they are a different topic, and they deserve a different tag.)

added 61 characters in body
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 2
  • 60
  • 122

I think neither "simplices" nor "simplex-theory" captures the topic that is currently described by "simplicial-stuff". If we want to rename it, maybe "simplicial-objects"? (even if taken literally is a bit more restrictive). I like a lot "simplicial-stuff" though, and I'd prefer to keep it.

That said, I think a tag-excerpt should definitely be added. What about the following variation on the math.stackexchange tag-excerptthe math.stackexchange tag-excerpt?

For questions about simplicial sets, simplicial (co)algebras and simplicial objects in other categories; geometric realization, Dold-Kahn correspondence, simplicial resolutions etc.

(I removed model structures from the description because we already have a tag for those)

I think neither "simplices" nor "simplex-theory" captures the topic that is currently described by "simplicial-stuff". If we want to rename it, maybe "simplicial-objects"? (even if taken literally is a bit more restrictive). I like a lot "simplicial-stuff" though, and I'd prefer to keep it.

That said, I think a tag-excerpt should definitely be added. What about the following variation on the math.stackexchange tag-excerpt?

For questions about simplicial sets, simplicial (co)algebras and simplicial objects in other categories; geometric realization, Dold-Kahn correspondence, simplicial resolutions etc.

(I removed model structures from the description because we already have a tag for those)

I think neither "simplices" nor "simplex-theory" captures the topic that is currently described by "simplicial-stuff". If we want to rename it, maybe "simplicial-objects"? (even if taken literally is a bit more restrictive). I like a lot "simplicial-stuff" though, and I'd prefer to keep it.

That said, I think a tag-excerpt should definitely be added. What about the following variation on the math.stackexchange tag-excerpt?

For questions about simplicial sets, simplicial (co)algebras and simplicial objects in other categories; geometric realization, Dold-Kahn correspondence, simplicial resolutions etc.

(I removed model structures from the description because we already have a tag for those)

Source Link
Denis Nardin
  • 16.5k
  • 14
  • 12
Loading