Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Nov 13, 2015 at 22:19 comment added Aaron Golden OK, I've gone ahead and asked on MO, keeping in mind @GerhardPaseman's advice to not ask anyone to read my work. Thanks!
Nov 12, 2015 at 17:58 comment added Gerhard Paseman Asking if it is in the literature (after you have done some looking) is definitely on-topic for MathOverflow; asking for feedback of your proof not so much. If you have an idea of how a simple proof might go, or want to verify a step in your proof, and are willing to accept a different proof, you can ask about the step or for a different proof. You can then point to your work for comparison, and maybe someone will have something to say about that. But don't ask them to read your stuff to answer your question. Gerhard "Nobody Likes To Read Anyway" Paseman, 2015.11.12
Nov 12, 2015 at 15:05 comment added Nick Gill It seems like a reasonable question to me. If you state it as a reference request along the lines of "I've convinced myself that this is true, but suspect that it should have already appeared in the literature" etc etc, then I would have thought it would be received positively... You could also flag up if you have any lingering doubts.
Nov 12, 2015 at 1:20 history edited Aaron Golden CC BY-SA 3.0
Fix title typo s/on/of
Nov 12, 2015 at 0:28 history edited Aaron Golden CC BY-SA 3.0
Correct title "Newton basins" not "Newton's method"
Nov 12, 2015 at 0:19 history asked Aaron Golden CC BY-SA 3.0