Timeline for What needs math?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Jan 28, 2015 at 14:38 | comment | added | Todd Trimble Mod | individ, I can barely understand your English, but it sounds like you are too angry to be able to understand the points that people are making. (For example, your post at the Hilbert's 10th problem was wildly off-topic.) I think there is little point now in my trying to help you see. I gently suggest that you take a break from MO for a while. (Or, you can continue down this path of mutual frustration. It's your choice.) | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 6:40 | comment | added | individ | @ToddTrimble Who told You that used this method of calculation? I on the contrary was told that you can only use one method of calculation. In the case of using other methods of calculating the answers will be deleted. Here in this topic mathoverflow.net/questions/173541/… When led as an example, formula solving quadratic forms. To see some of you there math.stackexchange.com/questions/738446/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/794510/… | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 13:17 | comment | added | Todd Trimble Mod | individ, in the post that you linked to, are you saying the community response to the question is inconsistent with the response to your posts, or is it the answer? I think the answer is great: it places the question in a clean conceptual framework where the method of solution (parametrizing a conic via stereographic projection) has been known for centuries. The question itself is not to my own taste because it's very busy or too detailed to be easily readable, but at least someone latched onto the key component and explained what was really going on. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 5:11 | comment | added | individ | I still don't understand. In the topic You mentioned the author wrote the sets of polynomials without conclusion and evidence and that no one removes. My attempt to discuss the solution of systems of nonlinear equations - I was erased. mathoverflow.net/questions/146768/… I'm trying to sort out these issues that are in front of you never had. Are you interested in the completeness of the solutions. I am interested in methods of calculation. The formula can either be or not. Bad formula does not happen. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 0:28 | history | edited | Todd TrimbleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 247 characters in body
|
| Jan 26, 2015 at 22:14 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | It might be added that partial answers are welcome when appropriate, and many on MathOverflow who post such answers understand this by including text like "This is not a complete answer, but may be useful." If the original poster does not understand what is desired, even despite helpful comments directed to help them understand, then this forum may be the wrong one for the poster and such answers. Gerhard "Partially Answering With Helpful Comments" Paseman, 2015.01.26 | |
| Jan 26, 2015 at 21:25 | history | answered | Todd TrimbleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |