Timeline for Why was this question asking non-trivial examples of closed subschemes closed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2014 at 20:56 | comment | added | Makoto Kato | Since people continue to upvote this answer, I repeat I ACCEPTED Moret-Bailly's example. | |
| Mar 23, 2014 at 16:58 | comment | added | Makoto Kato | @ToddTrimble If I don't misunderstand his answer, his curve is reduced. So it does not satisfy the condition of the question. | |
| Mar 23, 2014 at 12:37 | comment | added | Todd Trimble Mod | You rejected abx's answer which mentioned infinitely many examples because they are "essentially one". You then told abx that he/she obviously didn't understand the question. That word "essentially" doesn't make the intended question any easier to understand; one has to guess what you consider "essentially different", and also how many "essentially different" examples are required to satisfy you. Two? Three? More than ten? (To your rhetorical question: "big list" questions are allowed, but they work best when the recipient is happy to hear the answers and gives thanks instead of objections.) | |
| Mar 23, 2014 at 9:05 | comment | added | Makoto Kato | @ToddTrimble [I think a trouble is that no one has any clear idea what sort of answer would satisfy you.} I'm asking examples of closed irreducible subschemes of a complete non-projective non-singular variety whose underlying subspace is $Z$, other than $Z_n$. What's so difficult to understand this? I also said the more examples, the better, which means that I'm asking a big list of examples. Asking a big list of examples is not allowed here? | |
| Mar 23, 2014 at 9:04 | comment | added | Makoto Kato | I accepted Moret-Bailly's example. | |
| Mar 23, 2014 at 4:59 | comment | added | Todd Trimble Mod | I think a trouble is that no one has any clear idea what sort of answer would satisfy you. I have noticed that many of the threads you introduce have this character, where people offer various answers that are sensible but which are invariably rejected for one reason or another. This is frustrating and tends to erode the feeling that questions are being asked in good faith. Hence the reason for closure: "unclear what is being asked". | |
| Mar 23, 2014 at 2:59 | comment | added | Kim Morrison Mod | I look forward to seeing this answer accepted! :-) | |
| Mar 23, 2014 at 2:56 | history | answered | S. CarnahanMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |