Timeline for Potential "technical" obstacle to migrations, and suggestion for a solution
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
30 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.mathoverflow.net/ with https://meta.mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:10 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jan 22, 2014 at 23:44 | comment | added | Ricardo Andrade | @quid, thank you. Please let me know if and how I can help. | |
| Jan 22, 2014 at 23:13 | comment | added | user9072 | @RicardoAndrade no problem, I will do it (soon). For awareness here: I'd see how things develop there and then decide if awareness from here seems useful. | |
| Jan 22, 2014 at 21:37 | comment | added | Ricardo Andrade | @quid, that sounds like a good idea. If you don't mind, would you be willing to start such a thread on meta.stats.stackexchange? However, I can also do it, if you prefer. By the way, would it be a good idea to raise some awareness here on meta.mathoverflow about such a thread there? | |
| Jan 22, 2014 at 19:41 | comment | added | user9072 | @RicardoAndrade another idea could be to ask on the stats site to make st.statistics a synonym of mathematical-statistics a tag they have. Perhaps one (you or I) simply should go ahaed and ask on their meta regarding this. | |
| Jan 21, 2014 at 10:54 | comment | added | user9072 | @RicardoAndrade I assume the actual creation needs to be done by developpers (not moderators). AFAIK there is a chat-room of all the different sites' moderators and developpers. I think this venue could be good for such a discussion (or something along these lines). That is, locally, we should get some moderators attention. Maybe via a new meta question. | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 22:48 | comment | added | Ricardo Andrade | @quid, any ideas on how to achieve such a thing at stats.stackexchange? Are there perhaps some MathOverflow users who can take care of it, like Willie Wong did at Math.StackExchange? | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 22:06 | comment | added | user9072 | @RicardoAndrade good point! For stats it might suffice to get st.statistics to be an intrinisic tag there (most q should have it and if not it could be added by somebody). I strongly assume statistics is an intrinsic tag there already, but this does not help us as we have the prefix-version. (An intrinsic tag is a tag that is typically blacklisted on the site as too generic but in case of migration will be accepted as "valid" tag so the mig can happen though the tag is still removed).// Willie Wong: thanks! I commented there. | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 16:15 | comment | added | Ricardo Andrade | We may also want to ask people at stats.stackexchange.com to add a couple of synonyms which will ease migration there. For example, a question at MathOverflow just failed to be migrated because it was tagged with 'st.statistics' only. | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 11:27 | comment | added | Willie Wong | @quid: I have entered most of them now. There are a few with some problems. I would appreciate comments on the answer that I posted on the link that you gave. | |
| Jan 16, 2014 at 13:08 | comment | added | Willie Wong | @quid: like I said, slowly slowly I will put them in. Unfortunately the interface for entering synonyms rather deliberately slows down the process. | |
| Jan 16, 2014 at 13:03 | comment | added | user9072 | @WillieWong sorry about the confusion! I did not follow up on that comment than for reasoning along these lines, but then that meta thread reminded me of the issue. I think it would be really helpful if this could be done, for the topl-level tags at least, at least the large ones say number-theory, algebraic-geometry, combinatorics. | |
| Jan 16, 2014 at 12:25 | comment | added | Willie Wong | @quid: my comment was supposed to be a joke.... but no matter. if I get some time I'll fill out some of the ones there. | |
| Jan 13, 2014 at 12:11 | history | edited | user9072 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added reminder on pratcical consequences
|
| Jan 13, 2014 at 12:07 | comment | added | user9072 | @WillieWong I do not really consider this as a solution but likely something like this is about the only wrokaround we have. Could you (or somebody else) perhaps follow through with meta.math.stackexchange.com/questions/12307/… at least for the most common ones; I think it will be more effecient to do this as a batch than literally doing what you suggest. | |
| Jan 13, 2014 at 12:01 | history | edited | user9072 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
udpate after "decline" on meta.SO
|
| Dec 11, 2013 at 14:35 | comment | added | Willie Wong | One way to solve this problem is that every time a migration fails for this reason, flag down Mariano and ask him to create the appropriate synonym at MSE. | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 0:46 | history | edited | user9072 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added infor regarding outcome of disc, ie posting on meta.SO
|
| Dec 5, 2013 at 12:01 | answer | added | Kaveh | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 19:53 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila Mod | quid, if a question cannot be migrated, then perhaps two swallows could carry it on a string of creeper held under the dorsal guiding feathers, and carry it to Mercia. | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 18:23 | comment | added | user35354 | I'd go straight for asking this check to be removed entirely network-wide, I was pretty suprised that it even existed and I think this kind of check is fundamentally flawed and just not a good idea. | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 17:55 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | I’d call this check “madness” rather than “sanity”. There is no sane reason why tags should be expected to be cross-site compatible (either in name or in their meaning), and for that matter, why should having no tags shared with the destination site prevent migration. Let the math.SE folks tag it as they see fit. | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 16:45 | comment | added | user9072 | Please do not discuss, here, whether the particular question should/should not be migrated, or the general merits of migration. | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 16:43 | history | asked | user9072 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |