Timeline for On the role of anonymity in a site dedicated to research-level mathematics
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 18, 2018 at 12:33 | comment | added | LSpice | There's also a difference between "not anonymous" as in "available to people who are specifically given the authority to view the content" (as with (especially work) e-mails) and "not anonymous" as in "available to everyone" (as with posts on MO or the arXiv). | |
Nov 2, 2013 at 20:14 | history | edited | Niemi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
Nov 2, 2013 at 15:16 | comment | added | Niemi | @Bill. What you point out is interesting (I do not work in the Sates, though), but I hope its not meant as a counterargument to what I said. Just because there is lack of privacy in one area does not mean that I willingly give it up everywhere. | |
Nov 2, 2013 at 15:05 | comment | added | Mark Meckes | And even if you don't work for a state institution, your work email is probably subject to any inquiry your employer chooses to make or cooperate with. | |
Nov 2, 2013 at 15:03 | comment | added | alvarezpaiva | @Niemi: I can appreciate that too. Bill's comment underlines that we have little privacy to start with. | |
Nov 2, 2013 at 15:00 | history | edited | Niemi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
Nov 2, 2013 at 14:53 | comment | added | Bill Johnson | Are you equally careful when using email? There is no security there, and not only in the transmission. If you work at a typical State university in the USA, all of your emails are subject to freedom of information inquiries. | |
Nov 2, 2013 at 14:33 | history | answered | Niemi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |