12
$\begingroup$

For a long time, these two custom close reasons used to be available:

  • This question does not appear to be about research level mathematics within the scope defined in the help center.

  • MathOverflow is for mathematicians to ask each other questions about their research. See Math.StackExchange to ask general questions in mathematics.

The second one now seems to be gone. So I wanted to ask:

  1. Is this just some glitch or a mistake - or was this changed on purpose? When did this change happen?

  2. Is this maybe just a temporary change - while the moderators are working on some modifications to the custom close reasons?

  3. If the change is permanent, was this a decision by the moderators? Or was this discussed with the wider MO community somewhere?


I am aware of the recent post by one of the moderators: Revamping the closure reasons in 2022. (Actually, I took the wording of the second closed reason from the screenshot in the post.) I might have missed something, but I do not see any mention of removing the mention of MSE completely. (I've seen a suggestion to modify that close reason in Tim Campion's question and an answer posted there suggests to merge the two close reasons into one. But neither of those two proposals suggest to remove the link to MSE.)

I am aware that there were some suggestions to remove the close reason explicitly mentioning Mathematics Stack Exchange. There was a question about back in 2019 which - among other things - mentions this suggestion: Are we making it too tempting/easy to send inappropriate posts to MSE? But no answer was posted there - only several comments.

I have seen suggestions along these lines in comments. For example, in this recent discussion.

There were also several questions asking what is actually the difference between these two close reasons. (And sometimes how the one about Math.SE is different from migration.)


I am not saying the this change is bad. (My stance whether or not this was an improvement would be neutral.)

But I was surprised that this was changed without some previous announcement or some clear consensus in the previous discussions. (If I missed the announcement or the discussion about the removal of that close reason, then I apologize for an unnecessary post.)


A screenshot showing what I see as the custom close reasons at the moment (as of 2022-06-04, when this question was posted):

screenshot


Update. In the meantime one additional close reason was added: "This question is either a request to check work for correctness or an announcement of results....." There is a separate question about this new close reason: New community close vote reason.

The screenshots and texts of the versions we've seen so far are posted in this chatroom. (Feel free to use that chatroom for discussion related to the new close reason, if you prefer chat to comments.)

It is a bit unclear whether the mods plan to make further changes. But the comments below this question suggest that they might be plans to modify them further. (Specifically, I mean Stefan Kohl's comment saying that: "The updated "not research level mathematics" close reason will point users to Math.SE, with a somewhat longer and better explanation.") Moreover, I would expect that that when the changes are finished, the mods will post some kind of announcement here on meta.

$\endgroup$
8
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ We are revising the custom closing reasons at the moment. You may experience some technical difficulties. $\endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila Mod
    Jun 4 at 8:20
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ @GeraldEdgar Yes, this is a question about MO. As mentioned above (and in the linked posts), one of the close reasons here on MO used to say: "MathOverflow is for mathematicians to ask each other questions about their research. See Math.StackExchange to ask general questions in mathematics." $\endgroup$ Jun 4 at 11:12
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @AsafKaragila Any timeframe on when these difficulties might get solved? The missing close reason is one I (and I’m sure many other close voters) used the most often. $\endgroup$ Jun 5 at 6:21
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ @EmilJeřábek: If not by tomorrow, then by Tuesday. Let me also add that it was a useless closing reason in 90% of the times it was used. Badly written questions shouldn't be sent elsewhere, they should just be closed. $\endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila Mod
    Jun 5 at 8:51
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ It's the ideal close reason for questions that are not quite suitable for migration, but nevertheless would be on-topic at math.SE, and last but not least, it serves the purpose of directing the OP to math.SE for their future questions. $\endgroup$ Jun 5 at 13:20
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ @EmilJeřábek The updated "not research level mathematics" close reason will point users to Math.SE, with a somewhat longer and better explanation. $\endgroup$
    – Stefan Kohl Mod
    Jun 5 at 14:01
  • $\begingroup$ @EmilJeřábek: It is the ideal, yes. But the bar is sufficiently high that hardly any question is ideal for that closing reason. $\endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila Mod
    Jun 6 at 9:13
  • $\begingroup$ So new closing option has been added. Martin, you might update the question? (it's partly addressed by meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/5364 but I'm not sure the latter is optimally formulated, and it makes little mention of the removed option) $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Jun 15 at 20:44

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

We've changed the close reasons; as mentioned, this question came mid-stream. See the answer here for an explanation.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ So in the end, the change was made on Monday rather than Tuesday. :-) $\endgroup$ Jun 27 at 15:03
  • $\begingroup$ @MartinSleziak This is MathOverflow after all. We run a tight ship :) $\endgroup$
    – Tim Campion Mod
    Jun 27 at 15:04
  • $\begingroup$ On a more serious note, if somebody has some observations, comments, objections, bug reports, etc. (concerning the new close reasons), I guess the right place to discuss them is the linked post - or a completely new question if needed. Is that correct? (I have created a chatroom related to this - but so far it didn't attract any attention.) $\endgroup$ Jun 27 at 15:07
  • $\begingroup$ @MartinSleziak That makes sense. Thanks for mentioning the chatroom. I'm sure there will be a learning curve for everybody. $\endgroup$
    – Tim Campion Mod
    Jun 27 at 15:08

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .