Currently we have quotes, but
the quoted text looks more faint than the surrounding text
The vertical bar hardly helps, I believe. In fact I think (although I cannot explain it) that this bar somehow makes things even worse.
OK I realize that all this is my subjective impression, but I can imagine that many users would agree with it.
One can make the quoted text bold,
but this somehow cries out too much, at the same time still remaining too faint by some reason.
What else? There is code,
but again this is something still different, right?
Is there any rationale behind this particular style of quoting?
Slightly later:
One more possibility occurred to me: one might abuse MathJax with $\color{red}{\textsf{some $\rm\TeX$ hacks}}$, including $\require{color}\colorbox{pink}{background highlighting}$ (done, respectively, like this $\color{red}{\textsf{some $\rm\TeX$ hacks}}$
and this $\require{color}\colorbox{pink}{background highlighting}$
), but I'm afraid this solution might be objectionable. What do you think?
\TeX
really need the\rm
? Experiment: without\rm
$\TeX$ versus with\rm
$\rm\TeX$. Huh, so it does. What about outside of math mode? \TeX Aha, I see it doesn't register there at all. $\endgroup$\color
stays in math mode while the (main) argument of\colorbox
is switched to the text mode. So to write colored upright $\rm\TeX$ one needs to make two more switchings the second of which I failed to make and which Asaf kindly provided. $\endgroup$