# List of close reasons has changed?

I just wanted to vote to close a question, and it looks like the list of options has changed

The options are now:

• Duplicate of...
• Off-topic because...
• Needs details or clarify
• Needs more focus
• Opinion-based

In particular, the bottom three seem to been altered to sound more conciliatory, and the 'other reason' option (I think there was one!) is gone. (Edit hmm, the 'other' reason is still under 'off-topic', I might have mis-remembered where it was)

When did this happen?

• This is part of the “new post notices” thing: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/339700/… . – Emil Jeřábek Dec 12 '19 at 9:36
• Thanks, @Emil I saw also Martin's explanation in the chat. – David Roberts Dec 12 '19 at 10:40
• Since the conversation in chat have been mentioned in the previous comment, I will also add a link to that conversation. – Martin Sleziak Dec 12 '19 at 11:57
• Also, it seems that the "on hold" designation no longer exists. It is called "closed" as in the (remote) past. – Gerald Edgar Dec 12 '19 at 12:04
• I think “unclear what you are asking” was much clearer(!) and actually no less conciliatory. More important: who closed the question apparently stopped being public information (before|after). That’s bad. – Francois Ziegler Dec 12 '19 at 16:54
• @EmilJeřábek Could you please write it as an answer rather than a comment? – Federico Poloni Dec 12 '19 at 18:49
• @FrancoisZiegler: The people who voted to close are visible if it's your question or if you have over 3K rep (i.e. have the power to vote to reopen). In particular, I can see who voted to close on the question you linked. Were you logged in? It's not obvious to me why it's terrible for that information to be restricted to those groups. (And I can see a small advantage: those of us who use our real names are less likely to be harassed, threatened, or killed by trolls who don't like that we closed a question.) – Noah Snyder Dec 13 '19 at 17:52
• @NoahSnyder Understood; I can see everything fine, but suspected the change and linked the “non logged-in” google cache because that phrase appeared: “(Viewable by the post author and users with the close/reopen votes privilege)”. To me that’s bad because those in power (any kind of power) should be accountable. (In the case at hand, I also find “This question is off-topic” way less conciliatory than “put on-hold as off-topic by a,b,c,x,y”.) – Francois Ziegler Dec 13 '19 at 18:18
• @FrancoisZiegler I agree with you, but unfortunately the general idea behind SE is that the moderators' power is not accountable. – Federico Poloni Dec 20 '19 at 13:33
• @FedericoPoloni MO $\ne$ SE ;) – Francois Ziegler Dec 21 '19 at 8:37
• @FrancoisZiegler What do you mean by that? We must use the same platform, so if (for instance) recently deleted questions are very well hidden on SE, then the same must hold for MO. Unless we decide to leave the platform. – Federico Poloni Dec 21 '19 at 10:30