See < https://mathoverflow.net/questions/134652/foundations-of-mathematics-and-set-theory>, where the reasons for closing are slightly too relevant/not relevant at all. How many of these fields are there that we still need to fill in?
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
5
-
$\begingroup$ I see "Questions on Empty are expected to generally relate to , within the scope defined in the faq," which is more than a little weird. $\endgroup$– Gerry MyersonJun 25, 2013 at 5:14
-
$\begingroup$ Maybe it should have said "Questions on $\emptyset$ ..." :-P $\endgroup$– David Roberts ModJun 25, 2013 at 5:18
-
$\begingroup$ oh, MathJax now works (even in comments) $\endgroup$– David Roberts ModJun 25, 2013 at 5:31
-
3$\begingroup$ Geoff fixed this. Just a heads-up: we're rolling out new close-reason code tomorrow, so enjoy the new-old ones while you can... $\endgroup$– Shog9Jun 25, 2013 at 6:19
-
$\begingroup$ The Meta Stack Exchange post about the new closing system that Shog9 mentioned above: closing changes $\endgroup$– KavehJun 25, 2013 at 6:58
Add a comment
|