0
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

I don't yet have the required reputation nor the answer-votes, yet I'd like to suggest identifying the tags
& with the (already synonymous) pair
& . All four tags seem perfectly equivalent. (Or maybe some discussion will show they are not?)
Likewise for and .

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by S. Carnahan Aug 23 '14 at 22:23

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The traditional way to get this done is to post an answer here. In any case, those clearly need cleanup. Any thoughts on which one to keep? $\endgroup$ – François G. Dorais Aug 23 '14 at 21:26
  • $\begingroup$ calculus-of-variations and variational-calculus are already synonyms. $\endgroup$ – François G. Dorais Aug 23 '14 at 21:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please ignore what the template says about your question. I'm closing it so we can keep discussion about merging tags in one place. $\endgroup$ – S. Carnahan Aug 23 '14 at 22:24

Browse other questions tagged .