61
$\begingroup$

The new site is now up and running (outside the SE network) here

https://www.physicsoverflow.org/

PhysicsOverflow is meant to be some kind of a rebirth of the untimely passed away Theoretical Physics SE and a little physics brother of MathOverflow.

Compared to the former theoretical physics site, we have slightly lowered the bar to ask questions to graduate-level upward and broadened the scope to include experimental physics and phenomenology.

Apart from the high-level Q&A, PhysicsOverflow will offer in the future a Reviews section, dedicated to discuss and peer review (mostly ArXiv but other sources can be considered too) papers publicly and "in real time".

We would be very happy to welcome some of the nice people here, who are interested for example in theoretical/mathematical physics too, on PhysicsOverflow.

Cheers

$\endgroup$
18
  • $\begingroup$ Please feel free to close this, if it is off-topic ... $\endgroup$
    – Dilaton
    Apr 6 '14 at 9:06
  • 29
    $\begingroup$ No, I think it's very much on-topic, and best wishes for the new site! $\endgroup$
    – Todd Trimble Mod
    Apr 6 '14 at 12:32
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Thanks @ToddTrimble :-) $\endgroup$
    – Dilaton
    Apr 6 '14 at 12:44
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Godspeed, and don't abuse set theory too much, eh! (Something that was rarely done on physics sites, but when it happens, it always causes me to irk and grind my teeth.) $\endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila Mod
    Apr 6 '14 at 15:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Physics Overflow is temporarily down for a while due to a technical glitch with the host. This has occurred only about twice or thrice, unfortunately, shamefully enough, always after we went public. $\endgroup$ Apr 6 '14 at 16:02
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ The site looks good and quite functional. Congratulations. After reading this post on the underlying software, I am curious. I hope either you or @Dimensio1n0 can provide some information. Can you share your impressions so far on using Q2A compared to using the stackexchange platform? Also, how much did you have to modify Q2A to get to the current state? $\endgroup$ Apr 6 '14 at 22:01
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Hi @RicardoAndrade, of course SE is much more "polished", and has many features native Q2A does not offer. But Q2A has also some advantages, for example posts can not only be categorized by tags but by higher level categories too to partition the site a bit. One of the most difficult tasks was to import the TP.SE questions from the data dump, and making LaTex work correctly was not exactly stright forward either. Our philosophy when modifying Q2A was to modify or add "external" components such as plugins, customizing the site them for design issues, install java scripts, etc whenever possible $\endgroup$
    – Dilaton
    Apr 7 '14 at 9:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ and modify the core code of Q2A only if inevitably needed, to not lose compatibility with updates Q2A implements. $\endgroup$
    – Dilaton
    Apr 7 '14 at 10:01
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @RicardoAndrade In addition to what Dilaton said, Q2A allows the ability to (logically) link questions two answers. Unfortunately, there are no inbuilt review queues, and the tag description plug in is not that great, so we achieved these by meta posts, pages on a separate wiki, etc. $\endgroup$ Apr 7 '14 at 10:41
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Also, through a plug-in, we have comment voting (both up and down), while SE only offers upvoting for comments. And we can make vote counts appear separately (+ and -) by default without any reputation barrier, or needing to click. See here for the full list. $\endgroup$ Apr 7 '14 at 11:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "+1" and congrts. Just signed up to upvote. One day I shall be an expert and will be a part of that community. Although I have given a shot to one of my question from Phys.SE there. :-) $\endgroup$
    – user31782
    May 2 '14 at 14:12
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't PO a part of the SE network? Why doesn't it show there? $\endgroup$
    – 299792458
    Sep 1 '14 at 6:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @New_new_newbie PO was launched outside the SE network, to avoid having to fullfill any externally prescribed activity criteria. $\endgroup$
    – Dilaton
    Sep 1 '14 at 8:24
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Dilaton - Thanks. I was contemplating joining PO and apparently I can't do that automatically using the SE profile. Your page mentions that users whose questions are imported should reclaim their Physics.SE account, but what about the others? I mean I had a grad-level question on P.SE that's unanswered over there, so maybe that can be imported in the future. $\endgroup$
    – 299792458
    Sep 2 '14 at 6:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @TheDarkSide That's fine, you can register as a new user and ask for your posts to be imported here. $\endgroup$ Mar 29 '15 at 10:46
1
$\begingroup$

I think that this proposal/project for a new site (the rebirth of the site that you've evoked) is very interesting. Congratulations and very good luck.

A year ago I tried to ask in this site MathOverflow a question about physics, in fact I tried to ask for permission in a fair way in this Meta of MathOverflow. The post that I evoke (now deleted) Asking if the following post could be suitable for the main site MathOverflow was a verbatim copy of the post that I've edited in Meta of Physics Stack Exchange entitled Asking if the following post could be suitable for the main site Physics Stack Exchange (this Meta PSE 12909). My purpose was good, as result a moderator, an user that added a nice comment in the thread of comments of yourself post, insulted to me claiming that I was trolling: this summarizes what can be reception and feedback here on MathOverflow, when one (at this ocassion my person) asks about falsifiability and a hypothesis at the edge... of our Solar System. Wow! As you see isn't a provocation.

Many thanks for your site.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Note that the original post is from 2014. It got bumped to the top by a "spam answer" which has since been deleted. $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Aug 5 at 18:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In the unlikely event that anyone is interested, the deleted post to which OP refers was meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4597/… $\endgroup$ Aug 6 at 0:04
  • $\begingroup$ Many thanks for the comments of the professors, in particular your reply @GerryMyerson where is added the reference of the mentioned post deleted by the moderator. I never had the option to add a response for the moderator's post and his actions: if I remember well I woke up/connected (I still had internet at home) and he had already posted an answer and deleted the entire thread of posts $\endgroup$
    – user142929
    Aug 6 at 10:45
  • $\begingroup$ I also want to honor those few persons who keep the flame of physics alive on this site: few professors that post answers about physical content, these contributions enrich the site and remind us of the relationship of physics and mathematics. About my rant of the moderation for the post that I refer I'm done here (in my feeling there is not a special issue about it and I wish the best for him, just I think that if an user is spamming a website there are procedures to avoid it without claming that a person is trolling) $\endgroup$
    – user142929
    Aug 7 at 14:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .