Skip to main content
clarification
Source Link

It appears that XyJax is developed independently from MathJax. As a result, MathJax will not support ornor test XyJax. This makes integration into MathOverflow difficult since we need to have reliable support for new features. We cannot implement such features without a suitable support plan from the XyJax developers.

It appears that XyJax is developed independently from MathJax. As a result, MathJax will not support or test XyJax. This makes integration into MathOverflow difficult since we need to have reliable support for new features.

It appears that XyJax is developed independently from MathJax. As a result, MathJax will not support nor test XyJax. This makes integration into MathOverflow difficult since we need to have reliable support for new features. We cannot implement such features without a suitable support plan from the XyJax developers.

edited body
Source Link

It appears that XYJaxXyJax is developed independently from MathJax. As a result, MathJax will not support or test XYJaxXyJax. This makes integration into MathOverflow difficult since we need to have reliable support for new features.

It appears that XYJax is developed independently from MathJax. As a result, MathJax will not support or test XYJax. This makes integration into MathOverflow difficult since we need to have reliable support for new features.

It appears that XyJax is developed independently from MathJax. As a result, MathJax will not support or test XyJax. This makes integration into MathOverflow difficult since we need to have reliable support for new features.

Source Link

It appears that XYJax is developed independently from MathJax. As a result, MathJax will not support or test XYJax. This makes integration into MathOverflow difficult since we need to have reliable support for new features.