Timeline for Who should be allowed to create a new tag?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 9, 2018 at 23:48 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | A minor clarification of one of the bullet points. A tag used only on one question is removed (after a certain time period) unless the tag-wiki was created for the tag. | |
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Sep 25, 2013 at 10:42 | history | edited | François G. DoraisMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 44 characters in body
|
Sep 25, 2013 at 8:12 | comment | added | user9072 | Well, if one wants to develop on the idea, one could have the approval/disaproval process contain an option to suggest merge/synonym, so that this steering would be built-in. @Kaveh yes this exists, it is single used tags and after 6 months. | |
Sep 24, 2013 at 23:31 | comment | added | Kaveh | Also infrequently used tags with only 1 (or 2?) questions get cleaned up every year(?) if I remember correctly. | |
Sep 24, 2013 at 22:52 | comment | added | François G. Dorais Mod | @quid That's worse than the current system. It's much better to steer someone into using lo.logic+forcing rather than having lo.logic+mathias-forcing degenerate into lo.logic alone because mathias-forcing was deemed too specific by someone. | |
Sep 24, 2013 at 22:41 | comment | added | user9072 | I do not think it is technically impossible. One could have something like a pending-tag which can be used right away but if not approved "self-destructs" after some fixed time. (One would just need to ensure there must be a stable tag, not only pending ones, on each question to avoid many untagged questions.) But I agreee it might not be worth the effort. | |
Sep 24, 2013 at 22:21 | history | edited | François G. DoraisMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 126 characters in body
|
Sep 24, 2013 at 22:10 | history | answered | François G. DoraisMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |