Timeline for Cancel the association bonus
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2016 at 16:55 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected minor typo (the question has been bumped anyway)
|
| Sep 28, 2015 at 0:37 | comment | added | mick | I agree mainly. | |
| Sep 13, 2013 at 9:16 | comment | added | user9072 | re comment via answer: this indirectly came up here meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/638/… For this site François G. Dorais comment there could be considered as 'official documentation' that this is the way to proceed if the comment is important. | |
| Sep 13, 2013 at 6:37 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | BTW this discussion suggests that posting answer instead of comment is the correct way to go for users with insufficient rep. (Although no links to official guidelines are given there to support those claims.) | |
| Sep 13, 2013 at 5:47 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | Good point. Maybe if the OP clarifies what exactly is the problem he experienced now, my post will become totally irrelevant for this post and I can delete it. (You asked for clarification in your comment Which powers that the association bonus grants are actually the problem?, too. | |
| Sep 13, 2013 at 5:44 | comment | added | user35354 | Users that receive the association bonus should know better than to post comments as answers. That is not always the case, but bad comments have the additional problem of low visibility to mods and the community, they don't bump and can remain undetected for long unless they are flagged. | |
| Sep 13, 2013 at 5:41 | history | answered | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |