Timeline for Why was diamond removed from some MO moderators?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 29 at 11:38 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Thanks, Ravi. Probably many people at MO are unaware of the enormous role you play. (While I'm here, I had wanted to find a way to thank @BillJohnson for an earlier comment, but I was too late. My apologies, Bill, if you see this.) | |
Oct 29 at 0:18 | comment | added | Ravi Vakil | It may not be surprising, but worth recording here that @ToddTrimble has been a particular pillar of MO behind the scenes as well! | |
Oct 15 at 18:55 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | @FrancescoPolizzi May I return the thanks, for all your contributions in helping to maintain these sites (here and at main). It's been a pleasure. | |
Oct 13 at 15:32 | comment | added | Francesco Polizzi | Thank you Todd, for your excellent work in moderation (yes, in both senses of the word). | |
Oct 13 at 9:21 | comment | added | polfosol | If I understood correctly, the root cause for stepping down was the influx of AI content and its consequences, which is a bit saddening. Nowadays, this kind of degradation is evident almost everywhere and I really miss the good old internet. Thank you and best wishes. | |
Oct 12 at 17:19 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Carlo, Yemon, Peter -- thank you! Your words mean a lot to me, as I regard each of you with great respect. (Peter, sorry for the brevity of my greeting at CT 2024; I hope we can speak at greater length at a future meeting!) | |
Oct 11 at 9:04 | comment | added | Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine | Another big thanks, Todd! Mathoverflow has remained for a long time now an island of collegiality and meaningfulness (with just occasional lapses) in an increasingly degraded internet, and I appreciate how much hard work you and the other moderators have put into maintaining this. Best of luck for all your other priorities now! | |
Oct 10 at 20:41 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Hi Todd - am a bit too busy for MO at the moment but just dropping by to also offer my appreciation of all your work and moderation, in both senses of the word. "They also serve who only stand and wait." | |
Oct 10 at 20:19 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | May I add my "big thanks". I wish you all the best in your future projects, Todd. We will miss your community building efforts here at MO. I started out on MO 13 years ago, and I have very much appreciated your thoughtful moderator comments during all those years. Thank you. | |
Oct 10 at 14:15 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Thank you, Sam. I'll just say that it's more difficult for nontechnical people like me. As you probably noticed, there are several discussions about AI currently on MO meta, but yes, still further discussion is needed. | |
Oct 10 at 13:54 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | Thank you for your service, Todd! The excellent leadership of MO over the past decade has made it a wonderful community to be a part of. But I do feel like you may be "burying the lede" here: if the recent surge of AI content has made life difficult for moderators, that might be worth a further discussion among all of the MO community. | |
Oct 10 at 12:29 | history | answered | Todd Trimble | CC BY-SA 4.0 |