Timeline for How do we fit in with Stack Exchange’s new AI agreement with Google?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7 at 19:11 | comment | added | Ben | The question could be broadened to include meta.stackexchange.com/questions/399619, or should this be a new question? | |
| Mar 24 at 14:17 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | Here's a basic question: Is SE getting any money from Google? If so, is MO seeing any of that money? | |
| Mar 13 at 16:53 | comment | added | joro | Is one of the mathoverflow overlords Anton Geraschenko still affiliated with google?: research.google/people/anton-geraschenko | |
| Mar 13 at 13:13 | comment | added | Johan | @FedericoPoloni For what it's worth, they did stop doing this last summer (see this answer and the question) and started again, very likely under the heavy pressures from users and admins of the network. | |
| Mar 13 at 7:57 | comment | added | Federico Poloni | SE publishes a quarterly data dump, so I suspect that everyone is already using their data to train AIs, exactly like they're using other copyrighted content all over the internet. | |
| Mar 12 at 22:38 | comment | added | David Roberts Mod | Stack Exchange Inc has been thirsting to get into the AI space for a while now. Their own attempts at using AI have been...not wildly successful. Selling the human-curated data with its community-generated quality signals is the next best thing, I guess. | |
| Mar 12 at 21:13 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | These are good questions. Is there any way we can get an official representative from Stack Exchange to answer them? | |
| Mar 12 at 20:16 | comment | added | The Amplitwist | Related Stack Overflow blog post: Defining socially responsible AI: How we select partners | |
| Mar 12 at 18:57 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| Mar 12 at 16:43 | history | asked | Tim CampionMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |