Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 15, 2022 at 9:27 comment added J.J. Green "I have a proof, and a counterexample, so one must be right", A. Fox, personal communication
Jul 10, 2022 at 14:08 comment added YCor When "plusoneing/minusoneing" questions, one can read "this question shows research effort / does not show any research effort". I think this is what applies here. A question such as "Is Wiles' proof of Fermat valid?" shows no research effort, and this also applies to "is this paper correct?" without further context.
Jul 9, 2022 at 7:12 comment added Ryan Budney @DavidRoberts: Certainly if their claims are the opposite of each other, that is one thing. But it's the nature of the argument, getting to the claim, that might lead to the greater contradiction.
Jul 9, 2022 at 6:59 comment added David Roberts Mod One paper claims A, the other claims not A, both in a generic mathematical setting (no foundational questions, everything in ZFC, i think); I don't think that in the exact context the statement A is independent of ZFC. But in principle that could be true in some other circumstance
Jul 9, 2022 at 6:54 comment added Ryan Budney @DavidRoberts: Alternatively, both papers could be wrong while contradicting each other.
Jul 9, 2022 at 6:53 comment added David Roberts Mod I would like an answer on the public record about the two Annals papers that Kevin Buzzard likes to point out are directly contradictory (without saying who got it wrong): which one is correct, and why is the wrong one wrong? How do you feel this sits in relation to your question?
Jul 8, 2022 at 22:14 answer added Kostya_I timeline score: 17
Jul 8, 2022 at 21:16 answer added Sam Hopkins timeline score: 24
Jul 8, 2022 at 20:54 history became hot meta post
Jul 8, 2022 at 19:59 history asked Ryan Budney CC BY-SA 4.0