I request for reopen the question with identificartor 423548 and title Soft question around the equivalent forms of Riemann hypothesis: an overview of the role of these equivalent forms, and this post is adressed to the readers (the recipient isn't, in exclusive, the professor who edited this thread post(s) in Meta).
I have a critic. The clousure of my question seems unfair, and now it's a challenge, for all us, to reopen it. If you've upvoted to close it, please be a leader and help me to reopen the question again.
With reverence and honors for the professors who stated an equivalent form to the Riemann hypothesis, I ask about the freedom to discuss the (mathematical) meaning of such big collection of equivalent forms. Don't wait, please, the next new dozen of equivalent forms and help now to improve the understanding about what's the Riemann hypothesis.
We must to know... don't put in risk the reputation of your profession in the way that any student could to ask, in a hall, the reason why is closed my question in MathOverflow.
'We must to know', said a mathematician. And at this date, in which we've forgotten the naive days, I'm sure of these words, that we can do it. Because we, mathematicians, need just an atticAttic night to rescue our civilizations. So, this can be a starting point of a coming hope memories, and a chance for all us.