Timeline for Can (and should) Project Euclid links be replaced in bulk?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2022 at 16:04 | history | edited | SlateStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 23, 2022 at 16:04 | answer | added | SlateStaffMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 20, 2022 at 16:32 | history | edited | Stefan KohlMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 20, 2022 at 14:10 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | @Randal'Thor I am aware of the link you provided - in fact I've listed it as an example here: Domains with dead links. I assume that MO users will be asked to clean up small batches first - that was the case in the previous request. But I'd hope that a CM would be willing to clean-up at least the links in the first three bullet points in bulk. (Maybe then the question we'll be whether similar thing can be done on other sites which have many links to Project Euclid.) | |
| Apr 20, 2022 at 13:43 | comment | added | Rand al'Thor | Ask the site moderators to ask the Stack Exchange Community Managers to ask the company devs to do this. (Or just flag this post asking mods to add the status-review tag, and the rest will follow.) It can be done automatically, other Stack Exchange sites have successfully achieved mass link updates by asking devs to do it all in one go. | |
| Apr 20, 2022 at 8:08 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak |
@DavidRoberts I think that there should be a FAQ posts explaining good/bad practices when citing articles. (Dead links are certainly less of a problem if the author and the title is given - as opposed to [this paper](URL).) In this specific instance, I agree that DOI links could be a good idea - bud the only way I see this being done in bulk (without bumping) is with projecuclid links. (We should keep in mind the limitations of the tools that are available.)
|
|
| Apr 19, 2022 at 10:41 | comment | added | David Roberts Mod | Ideally links should be supplemented with DOI links (when available) even when broken ProjectEuclid links are replaced by working ones. | |
| Apr 16, 2022 at 10:26 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 16, 2022 at 10:16 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 147 characters in body
|
| Apr 15, 2022 at 8:24 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 217 characters in body
|
| Apr 14, 2022 at 15:43 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Apr 14, 2022 at 15:31 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| Apr 14, 2022 at 15:20 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 134 characters in body
|
| Apr 14, 2022 at 14:14 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 163 characters in body
|
| Apr 14, 2022 at 12:26 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Apr 14, 2022 at 12:25 | answer | added | Martin Sleziak | timeline score: 13 | |
| Apr 14, 2022 at 12:25 | history | asked | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |