Timeline for On using MathJax to create 'white space'
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2013 at 22:21 | comment | added | user9072 | @TheMaskedAvenger: thanks, it somehow makes sense that this is like this. I used originally for the Yes! several zero width non-joiner (‌) then in the second Yes! only one of those, but in the No? I used a zero width space (​) which is what The User used presumably (as this is what they mentioned above in hex). So it seems you can see the zero width non-joiner (and if there are several than it is more visible) but not the zero width space. | |
| Jul 22, 2013 at 22:13 | comment | added | The Masked Avenger | It is more challenging, as what I perceive seems lighter than in a few comments above. I approximate (after zooming in) it as "Y(lighter |)es! No?" Again I am reporting, not doing copy-paste. | |
| Jul 22, 2013 at 21:56 | comment | added | user9072 | @TheMaskedAvenger: could you tell me if you see this again in one or both of: Yes! No? | |
| Jul 20, 2013 at 3:46 | comment | added | Fred Daniel Kline | | |
| Jul 19, 2013 at 22:41 | comment | added | The Masked Avenger | At this writing, (on a mobile phone browser), I see "Y|es!", "Yep.", and "-". Not exactly, but I want to indicate that quid's rendition does not look as clean as The User's rendition. | |
| Jul 19, 2013 at 15:42 | comment | added | Charles Staats | | |
| Jul 14, 2013 at 20:29 | comment | added | The User | Yep. | |
| Jul 14, 2013 at 20:07 | comment | added | user9072 | Yes! | |
| Jul 14, 2013 at 19:56 | history | answered | Andrew Stacey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |