Skip to main content

Timeline for How to treat `polymath' questions?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 12, 2013 at 3:16 comment added Theo Johnson-Freyd @quid: All sounds great, and as I said, I have no complaints about the current mores.
Jul 11, 2013 at 23:18 comment added user9072 To add to this it is true there are SE sites for challenges and puzzles, in programming, for example codegolf.stackexchange.com But of course this is a site separate from say Stack Overflow or Programmers and so on.
Jul 11, 2013 at 23:07 comment added user9072 Even if it were clear, it has nothing to do with research to refind things others did before when being prompted to do so. If enough people want a site specifically for math challenges and puzzles, it is easy enough to set one up on SE. (But I think such places exist already on the internet AoPS for example, AFAIK)
Jul 11, 2013 at 23:04 comment added user9072 If somebody seeks input for a res.problem and is very clear about what they know and intend, I might very hesitantly consider allowing this. (For actual collabortaion the site is unsuitable for one thing as this was way to noisy; this was one of the last disc. on the old meta, conclusion no. I see not reason to already revisit this.) The orig. question is absolute no-go for me; it was not clear it is a question where the OP knew a lot more about it then said. This is a considerable problem as it potentially wastes other peoples time. I answer here to help people, not for challenges.
Jul 11, 2013 at 22:51 comment added Theo Johnson-Freyd @quid: I didn't mean anything completely precise, but a question of the type linked --- an open problem, but one that seems like it could be quickly solved if you pose it as a problem-solving challenge. You know, if IMO or Putnam started putting open problems on the test...
Jul 11, 2013 at 22:39 comment added user9072 What is an "open challenge question"?
Jul 11, 2013 at 21:27 history answered Theo Johnson-Freyd CC BY-SA 3.0