Timeline for Should there be another tag for vector bundles in Algebraic geometry (over schemes)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 10, 2019 at 7:30 | vote | accept | Praphulla Koushik | ||
Oct 5, 2019 at 7:54 | comment | added | Praphulla Koushik | Yes, master.. no shame :) | |
Oct 5, 2019 at 7:45 | comment | added | YCor | I actually include myself among these "some people" (not for this particular tag which I don't subscribe, but many others). And also in congresses/seminars I attend which are supposedly in "my" field. This is part of student/researcher's life. If a subtopic is broad it's normal not to understand all its aspects, no shame. | |
Oct 5, 2019 at 7:35 | comment | added | Praphulla Koushik | @YCor “That some people reading the tag vector-bundles have difficulty with understanding those posts in algebraic geometry is part of the game”.. thank you.. :) every time you respond, it teach me something.. | |
Oct 5, 2019 at 6:24 | comment | added | YCor | I agree with S. Carnahan's answer. Multiplication of tags is results in a less coherent use and sets up artificial boundaries (differential and algebraic geometry are not disjoint settings). I'd even say that the fact the tag vector-bundles is transversal to those subjects makes it valuable. That some people reading the tag vector-bundles have difficulty with understanding those posts in algebraic geometry is part of the game. | |
Oct 3, 2019 at 23:42 | answer | added | S. CarnahanMod | timeline score: 7 | |
Oct 3, 2019 at 17:25 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor typo
|
Oct 3, 2019 at 16:38 | history | asked | Praphulla Koushik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |