Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

thanks to Gerry Myerson who pointed this out in a comment
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 2
  • 60
  • 122

Papers and other resources analyzing data about MathOverflow

Let us collect here resources which analyze various aspects of MO.

  • Montoya L.V., Ma A., Mondragón R.J. (2013) Social Achievement and Centrality in MathOverflow. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36844-8_3. This paper analyses mainly stuff related to users and interactions between them. It was referenced in Carlo Beenakker's answer to On Mathematical Analysis of MathSciNet & MathOverflow. and also in another discussion here on meta: Is MO connected?
  • Several papers by Yla R. Tausczik with various coauthors. The first one was Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2011. Predicting the Perceived Quality of Online Mathematics Contributions from Users' Reputations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pages 1885--1888; [DOI], [PDF]. There is a thread on tea related to a survey of MO users. The survey was used in: Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2012. Participation in an online mathematics community: Differentiating motivations to add. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, pages 207-216; [DOI], [PDF]. There is also a website summarizing these two papers: http://www.utpsyc.org/MathOverflowSurvey/MathOverflowStudies.php. There is also another MO related paper: Yla Tausczik, Aniket Kittur and Robert Kraut. 2014. Collaborative problem solving: A study of Math Overflow In 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2014) ACM, pages 355-367; [DOI], [PDF] was mentioned in the question "Statistics showing that more reputation for questions leads to better questions" on meta.
  • Ursula Martin, Alison Pease: What does mathoverflow tell us about the production of mathematics? https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0904. The authors study a sample of questions on MO, categorize them into various types and look at percentage answered. As Gerry Myerson pointed out, this paper is discussed in more detail in François G. Dorais' answer to Is MO connected?

Papers and other resources analyzing data about MathOverflow

Let us collect here resources which analyze various aspects of MO.

  • Montoya L.V., Ma A., Mondragón R.J. (2013) Social Achievement and Centrality in MathOverflow. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36844-8_3. This paper analyses mainly stuff related to users and interactions between them. It was referenced in Carlo Beenakker's answer to On Mathematical Analysis of MathSciNet & MathOverflow.
  • Several papers by Yla R. Tausczik with various coauthors. The first one was Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2011. Predicting the Perceived Quality of Online Mathematics Contributions from Users' Reputations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pages 1885--1888; [DOI], [PDF]. There is a thread on tea related to a survey of MO users. The survey was used in: Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2012. Participation in an online mathematics community: Differentiating motivations to add. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, pages 207-216; [DOI], [PDF]. There is also a website summarizing these two papers: http://www.utpsyc.org/MathOverflowSurvey/MathOverflowStudies.php. There is also another MO related paper: Yla Tausczik, Aniket Kittur and Robert Kraut. 2014. Collaborative problem solving: A study of Math Overflow In 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2014) ACM, pages 355-367; [DOI], [PDF] was mentioned in the question "Statistics showing that more reputation for questions leads to better questions" on meta.
  • Ursula Martin, Alison Pease: What does mathoverflow tell us about the production of mathematics? https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0904. The authors study a sample of questions on MO, categorize them into various types and look at percentage answered. As Gerry Myerson pointed out, this paper is discussed in more detail in François G. Dorais' answer to Is MO connected?

Papers and other resources analyzing data about MathOverflow

Let us collect here resources which analyze various aspects of MO.

  • Montoya L.V., Ma A., Mondragón R.J. (2013) Social Achievement and Centrality in MathOverflow. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36844-8_3. This paper analyses mainly stuff related to users and interactions between them. It was referenced in Carlo Beenakker's answer to On Mathematical Analysis of MathSciNet & MathOverflow and also in another discussion here on meta: Is MO connected?
  • Several papers by Yla R. Tausczik with various coauthors. The first one was Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2011. Predicting the Perceived Quality of Online Mathematics Contributions from Users' Reputations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pages 1885--1888; [DOI], [PDF]. There is a thread on tea related to a survey of MO users. The survey was used in: Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2012. Participation in an online mathematics community: Differentiating motivations to add. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, pages 207-216; [DOI], [PDF]. There is also a website summarizing these two papers: http://www.utpsyc.org/MathOverflowSurvey/MathOverflowStudies.php. There is also another MO related paper: Yla Tausczik, Aniket Kittur and Robert Kraut. 2014. Collaborative problem solving: A study of Math Overflow In 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2014) ACM, pages 355-367; [DOI], [PDF] was mentioned in the question "Statistics showing that more reputation for questions leads to better questions" on meta.
  • Ursula Martin, Alison Pease: What does mathoverflow tell us about the production of mathematics? https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0904. The authors study a sample of questions on MO, categorize them into various types and look at percentage answered. As Gerry Myerson pointed out, this paper is discussed in more detail in François G. Dorais' answer to Is MO connected?
added 148 characters in body
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 2
  • 60
  • 122

Papers and other resources analyzing data about MathOverflow

Let us collect here resources which analyze various aspects of MO.

  • Montoya L.V., Ma A., Mondragón R.J. (2013) Social Achievement and Centrality in MathOverflow. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36844-8_3. This paper analyses mainly stuff related to users and interactions between them. It was referenced in Carlo Beenakker's answer to On Mathematical Analysis of MathSciNet & MathOverflow.
  • Several papers by Yla R. Tausczik with various coauthors. The first one was Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2011. Predicting the Perceived Quality of Online Mathematics Contributions from Users' Reputations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pages 1885--1888; [DOI], [PDF]. There is a thread on tea related to a survey of MO users. The survey was used in: Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2012. Participation in an online mathematics community: Differentiating motivations to add. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, pages 207-216; [DOI], [PDF]. There is also a website summarizing these two papers: http://www.utpsyc.org/MathOverflowSurvey/MathOverflowStudies.php. There is also another MO related paper: Yla Tausczik, Aniket Kittur and Robert Kraut. 2014. Collaborative problem solving: A study of Math Overflow In 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2014) ACM, pages 355-367; [DOI], [PDF] was mentioned in the question "Statistics showing that more reputation for questions leads to better questions" on meta.
  • Ursula Martin, Alison Pease: What does mathoverflow tell us about the production of mathematics? https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0904. The authors study a sample of questions on MO, categorize them into various types and look at percentage answered. As Gerry Myerson pointed out, this paper is discussed in more detail in François G. Dorais' answer to Is MO connected?

Papers and other resources analyzing data about MathOverflow

Let us collect here resources which analyze various aspects of MO.

  • Montoya L.V., Ma A., Mondragón R.J. (2013) Social Achievement and Centrality in MathOverflow. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36844-8_3. This paper analyses mainly stuff related to users and interactions between them.
  • Several papers by Yla R. Tausczik with various coauthors. The first one was Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2011. Predicting the Perceived Quality of Online Mathematics Contributions from Users' Reputations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pages 1885--1888; [DOI], [PDF]. There is a thread on tea related to a survey of MO users. The survey was used in: Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2012. Participation in an online mathematics community: Differentiating motivations to add. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, pages 207-216; [DOI], [PDF]. There is also a website summarizing these two papers: http://www.utpsyc.org/MathOverflowSurvey/MathOverflowStudies.php. There is also another MO related paper: Yla Tausczik, Aniket Kittur and Robert Kraut. 2014. Collaborative problem solving: A study of Math Overflow In 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2014) ACM, pages 355-367; [DOI], [PDF] was mentioned in the question "Statistics showing that more reputation for questions leads to better questions" on meta.
  • Ursula Martin, Alison Pease: What does mathoverflow tell us about the production of mathematics? https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0904. The authors study a sample of questions on MO, categorize them into various types and look at percentage answered. As Gerry Myerson pointed out, this paper is discussed in more detail in François G. Dorais' answer to Is MO connected?

Papers and other resources analyzing data about MathOverflow

Let us collect here resources which analyze various aspects of MO.

  • Montoya L.V., Ma A., Mondragón R.J. (2013) Social Achievement and Centrality in MathOverflow. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36844-8_3. This paper analyses mainly stuff related to users and interactions between them. It was referenced in Carlo Beenakker's answer to On Mathematical Analysis of MathSciNet & MathOverflow.
  • Several papers by Yla R. Tausczik with various coauthors. The first one was Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2011. Predicting the Perceived Quality of Online Mathematics Contributions from Users' Reputations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pages 1885--1888; [DOI], [PDF]. There is a thread on tea related to a survey of MO users. The survey was used in: Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2012. Participation in an online mathematics community: Differentiating motivations to add. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, pages 207-216; [DOI], [PDF]. There is also a website summarizing these two papers: http://www.utpsyc.org/MathOverflowSurvey/MathOverflowStudies.php. There is also another MO related paper: Yla Tausczik, Aniket Kittur and Robert Kraut. 2014. Collaborative problem solving: A study of Math Overflow In 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2014) ACM, pages 355-367; [DOI], [PDF] was mentioned in the question "Statistics showing that more reputation for questions leads to better questions" on meta.
  • Ursula Martin, Alison Pease: What does mathoverflow tell us about the production of mathematics? https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0904. The authors study a sample of questions on MO, categorize them into various types and look at percentage answered. As Gerry Myerson pointed out, this paper is discussed in more detail in François G. Dorais' answer to Is MO connected?
deleted 8 characters in body
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 2
  • 60
  • 122

Papers and other resources analyzing data about MathOverflow

Let us collect here resources which analyze various aspects of MO.

  • Montoya L.V., Ma A., Mondragón R.J. (2013) Social Achievement and Centrality in MathOverflow. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36844-8_3. This paper analyses mainly stuff related to users and interactions between them.
  • Several papers by Yla R. Tausczik with various coauthors. The first one was Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2011. Predicting the Perceived Quality of Online Mathematics Contributions from Users' Reputations InPredicting the Perceived Quality of Online Mathematics Contributions from Users' Reputations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pages 1885--1888; [DOI], [PDF]. There is a thread on tea related to a survey of MO users. The survey was used in: Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2012. Participation in an online mathematics community: Differentiating motivations to addParticipation in an online mathematics community: Differentiating motivations to add. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, pages 207-216; [DOI], [PDF]. There is also a website summarizing these two papers: http://www.utpsyc.org/MathOverflowSurvey/MathOverflowStudies.php. There is also another MO related paper: Yla Tausczik, Aniket Kittur and Robert Kraut. 2014. Collaborative problem solving: A study of Math Overflow Collaborative problem solving: A study of Math Overflow In 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2014) ACM, pages 355-367; [DOI], [PDF] was mentioned in the question "Statistics showing that more reputation for questions leads to better questions" on meta.
  • Ursula Martin, Alison Pease: What does mathoverflow tell us about the production of mathematics? https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0904. The authors study a sample of questions on MO, categorize them into various types and look at percentage answered. As Gerry Myerson pointed out, this paper is discussed in more detail in François G. Dorais' answer to Is MO connected?

Papers and other resources analyzing data about MathOverflow

Let us collect here resources which analyze various aspects of MO.

  • Montoya L.V., Ma A., Mondragón R.J. (2013) Social Achievement and Centrality in MathOverflow. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36844-8_3. This paper analyses mainly stuff related to users and interactions between them.
  • Several papers by Yla R. Tausczik with various coauthors. The first one was Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2011. Predicting the Perceived Quality of Online Mathematics Contributions from Users' Reputations In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pages 1885--1888; [DOI], [PDF]. There is a thread on tea related to a survey of MO users. The survey was used in: Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2012. Participation in an online mathematics community: Differentiating motivations to add In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, pages 207-216; [DOI], [PDF]. There is also a website summarizing these two papers: http://www.utpsyc.org/MathOverflowSurvey/MathOverflowStudies.php. There is also another MO related paper: Yla Tausczik, Aniket Kittur and Robert Kraut. 2014. Collaborative problem solving: A study of Math Overflow In 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2014) ACM, pages 355-367; [DOI], [PDF] was mentioned in the question "Statistics showing that more reputation for questions leads to better questions" on meta.
  • Ursula Martin, Alison Pease: What does mathoverflow tell us about the production of mathematics? https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0904. The authors study a sample of questions on MO, categorize them into various types and look at percentage answered. As Gerry Myerson pointed out, this paper is discussed in more detail in François G. Dorais' answer to Is MO connected?

Papers and other resources analyzing data about MathOverflow

Let us collect here resources which analyze various aspects of MO.

  • Montoya L.V., Ma A., Mondragón R.J. (2013) Social Achievement and Centrality in MathOverflow. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36844-8_3. This paper analyses mainly stuff related to users and interactions between them.
  • Several papers by Yla R. Tausczik with various coauthors. The first one was Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2011. Predicting the Perceived Quality of Online Mathematics Contributions from Users' Reputations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pages 1885--1888; [DOI], [PDF]. There is a thread on tea related to a survey of MO users. The survey was used in: Yla Tausczik and James Pennebaker. 2012. Participation in an online mathematics community: Differentiating motivations to add. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, pages 207-216; [DOI], [PDF]. There is also a website summarizing these two papers: http://www.utpsyc.org/MathOverflowSurvey/MathOverflowStudies.php. There is also another MO related paper: Yla Tausczik, Aniket Kittur and Robert Kraut. 2014. Collaborative problem solving: A study of Math Overflow In 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2014) ACM, pages 355-367; [DOI], [PDF] was mentioned in the question "Statistics showing that more reputation for questions leads to better questions" on meta.
  • Ursula Martin, Alison Pease: What does mathoverflow tell us about the production of mathematics? https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0904. The authors study a sample of questions on MO, categorize them into various types and look at percentage answered. As Gerry Myerson pointed out, this paper is discussed in more detail in François G. Dorais' answer to Is MO connected?
+ Tausczik
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 2
  • 60
  • 122
minor typo
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 2
  • 60
  • 122
typo
Source Link
Gerry Myerson
Gerry Myerson
  • 39.9k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 21
added 165 characters in body
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 2
  • 60
  • 122
added 70 characters in body
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 2
  • 60
  • 122
added 8 characters in body
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 2
  • 60
  • 122
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 2
  • 60
  • 122
Post Made Community Wiki by Martin Sleziak