Timeline for Completely Unexplained Downvotes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2019 at 22:35 | comment | added | Joseph Van Name | "There is a significant number of people that don't take criticism well, even if it is constructive."-The people of MO are not very good are making constructive criticism. | |
| Jul 8, 2013 at 19:59 | comment | added | user9072 | @Dilaton: posts are sorted by score in the votes few, as you likely know. If you have the option of affecting the score by +1,0, and -1 then this gives more power to influence the sorting with also using downvotes. The same could be achieved with adding a +2 instead of -1, but then there should in my opinion be at least some way to influence rep also in the negative direction (it is annyway minimal), so that pure noise-contributors at least do not rise too quickly. That being said, I do not downvote much myself. [I do not conside the Q that started this in thhe noise cat though.] | |
| Jul 8, 2013 at 12:04 | comment | added | Dilaton | Posts can also be sorted by upvotes, they are a much friendlier sorting tool ... | |
| Jul 7, 2013 at 19:18 | comment | added | Vidit Nanda | Like I said, I don't think there should be a comment for every downvote. If there is already a comment which summarizes your negative reaction, just upvote that comment instead of posting your own. Otherwise, maybe there really are 2 different reasons to down-vote and hence twice as much feedback for the OP. | |
| Jul 7, 2013 at 19:03 | history | answered | user35354 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |