Return to Answer

What about creating small-uncountable-cardinals tag? (The tag name is within the recently increased 35 character limit.)

Looking at the main site, it seems that small uncountable cardinals (such as $\mathfrak p$, $\mathfrak t$, $\mathfrak b$, $\mathfrak d$, etc.) get quite a lot of attention on this site. For example, if you search for either of the cardinals mentioned before in the set theory tag, you can find a bunch of questions: p, t, b, d.)

I think that creating a separate tag for this topic might made searching for such questions easier. Additionally people who are interested in the topic could follow the tag. (I.e., they could get those questions highlighted, they have easier access to recent questions in their favorite tags, etc.)

Of course, it is possible to consider also other candidates for the name of the tag. Wikipedia uses Cardinal characteristic of the continuum. (For example, cardinal-characteristic-continuum is under the 35 characters limit.)

It seems that in the past mostly the tag set-theory was used for questions about this topic. (Perhaps sometimes also the infinite-combinatorics tag, which is a bit more specific.)

If the consensus is that the tag small-uncountable-cardinals would be too specific and it is better not to create such tag, I would be grateful also for comments suggesting which tags can be used for questions where small uncountable cardinals are the main topic. In the past I have sometimes added infinite-combinatorics to such questions - was it a reasonable choice?

What about creating small-uncountable-cardinals tag? (The tag name is within the recently increased 35 character limit.)

Looking at the main site, it seems that small uncountable cardinals (such as $\mathfrak p$, $\mathfrak t$, $\mathfrak b$, $\mathfrak d$, etc.) get quite a lot of attention on this site. For example, if you search for either of the cardinals mentioned before in the set theory tag, you can find a bunch of questions: p, t, b, d.)

I think that creating a separate tag for this topic might made searching for such questions easier. Additionally people who are interested in the topic could follow the tag. (I.e., they could get those questions highlighted, they have easier access to recent questions in their favorite tags, etc.)

Of course, it is possible to consider also other candidates for the name of the tag. Wikipedia uses Cardinal characteristic of the continuum. (For example, cardinal-characteristic-continuum is under the 35 characters limit.)

It seems that in the past mostly the tag set-theory was used for questions about this topic. (Perhaps sometimes also the infinite-combinatorics tag, which is a bit more specific.)

If the consensus is that the tag small-uncountable-cardinals would be too specific and it is better not to create such tag, I would be grateful also for comments suggesting which tags can be used for questions where small uncountable cardinals are the main topic. In the past I have sometimes added infinite-combinatorics to such questions - was it a reasonable choice?

What about creating small-uncountable-cardinals tag? (The tag name is within the recently increased 35 character limit.)

Looking at the main site, it seems that small uncountable cardinals (such as $\mathfrak p$, $\mathfrak t$, $\mathfrak b$, $\mathfrak d$, etc.) get quite a lot of attention on this site. For example, if you search for either of the cardinals mentioned before in the set theory tag, you can find a bunch of questions: p, t, b, d.)

I think that creating a separate tag for this topic might made searching for such questions easier. Additionally people who are interested in the topic could follow the tag. (I.e., they could get those questions highlighted, they have easier access to recent questions in their favorite tags, etc.)

It seems that in the past mostly the tag set-theory was used for questions about this topic. (Perhaps sometimes also the infinite-combinatorics tag, which is a bit more specific.)

If the consensus is that the tag small-uncountable-cardinals would be too specific and it is better not to create such tag, I would be grateful also for comments suggesting which tags can be used for questions where small uncountable cardinals are the main topic. In the past I have sometimes added infinite-combinatorics to such questions - was it a reasonable choice?

What about creating small-uncountable-cardinals tag? (The tag name is within the recently increased 35 character limit.)

Looking at the main site, it seems that small uncountable cardinals (such as $\mathfrak p$, $\mathfrak t$, $\mathfrak b$, $\mathfrak d$, etc.) get quite a lot of attention on this site. For example, if you search for either of the cardinals mentioned before in the set theory tag, you can find a bunch of questions: p, t, b, d.)

I think that creating a separate tag for this topic might made searching for such questions easier. Additionally people who are interested in the topic could follow the tag. (I.e., they could get those questions highlighted, they have easier access to recent questions in their favorite tags, etc.)

Of course, it is possible to consider also other candidates for the name of the tag. Wikipedia uses Cardinal characteristic of the continuum. (For example, cardinal-characteristic-continuum is under the 35 characters limit.)

It seems that in the past mostly the tag set-theory was used for questions about this topic. (Perhaps sometimes also the infinite-combinatorics tag, which is a bit more specific.)

If the consensus is that the tag small-uncountable-cardinals would be too specific and it is better not to create such tag, I would be grateful also for comments suggesting which tags can be used for questions where small uncountable cardinals are the main topic. In the past I have sometimes added infinite-combinatorics to such questions - was it a reasonable choice?

What about creating small-uncountable-cardinals tag? (The tag name is within the recently increased 35 character limits.)

Looking at the main site, it seems that small uncountable cardinals (such as $\mathfrak p$, $\mathfrak t$, $\mathfrak b$, $\mathfrak d$, etc.) get quite a lot of attention on this site. For example, if you search for either of the cardinals mentioned before in the set theory tag, you can find a bunch of questions: p, t, b, d.)

I think that creating a separate tag for this topic might made searching for such questions easier. Additionally people who are interested in the topic could follow the tag. (I.e., they could get those questions highlighted, they have easier access to recent questions in their favorite tags, etc.)

It seems that in the past mostly the tag set-theory was used for questions about this topic. (Perhaps sometimes also infinite-combinatorics tag, which is a bit more specific.)

If the consensus is that the tag small-uncountable-cardinals would be too specific and it is better not to create such tag, I would be grateful also for comments suggesting which tags can be used for questions where small uncountable cardinals are the main topic. In the past I have sometimes added infinite-combinatorics to such questions - was it a reasonable choice?

What about creating small-uncountable-cardinals tag? (The tag name is within the recently increased 35 character limit.)

Looking at the main site, it seems that small uncountable cardinals (such as $\mathfrak p$, $\mathfrak t$, $\mathfrak b$, $\mathfrak d$, etc.) get quite a lot of attention on this site. For example, if you search for either of the cardinals mentioned before in the set theory tag, you can find a bunch of questions: p, t, b, d.)

I think that creating a separate tag for this topic might made searching for such questions easier. Additionally people who are interested in the topic could follow the tag. (I.e., they could get those questions highlighted, they have easier access to recent questions in their favorite tags, etc.)

It seems that in the past mostly the tag set-theory was used for questions about this topic. (Perhaps sometimes also the infinite-combinatorics tag, which is a bit more specific.)

If the consensus is that the tag small-uncountable-cardinals would be too specific and it is better not to create such tag, I would be grateful also for comments suggesting which tags can be used for questions where small uncountable cardinals are the main topic. In the past I have sometimes added infinite-combinatorics to such questions - was it a reasonable choice?