Timeline for Flagging Low Quality Questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2022 at 9:00 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 614 characters in body
|
| May 28, 2022 at 10:16 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added SEDE queries
|
| May 28, 2022 at 10:05 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2017 at 6:02 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 25 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2017 at 5:47 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2017 at 4:48 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 718 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2017 at 4:36 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 624 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2017 at 4:21 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | It is a separate question when a question should be flagged as low quality - when I read the guidelines above, it seems that this flag is for questions which are almost unreadable, not as an addition to every close vote. But this is probably for a longer discussion. | |
| Jun 8, 2017 at 4:21 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | @StevenLandsburg If the question is changed like this, probably input from the users who are most active in reviewing would be a good thing. I've added some links to my post and read a bit more about review mechanisms. To me it seems that this does not add too much work to reviewers - as soon as the question is closed, it is removed from the review queue. Anyway, if your question has changed, perhaps it would make sense to edit the original post. (Other users are more likely to notice the change there rather than here in a comment.) | |
| Jun 8, 2017 at 4:17 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 952 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2017 at 4:06 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 318 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2017 at 3:50 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 168 characters in body
|
| Jun 7, 2017 at 21:25 | comment | added | Steven Landsburg | Thanks. I was in fact asking about VLQ flags. So the question should have been: For posts that are sufficiently low quality that they're likely to be closed in a hurry in any event, would other users prefer that I flag them as VLQ, or does that just clutter up the review queue? | |
| Jun 7, 2017 at 19:12 | history | answered | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |