Return to Question

Today and yesterday there were a considerable number of suggested edits to previously empty tag wikis and tag wiki excerpts (see here; viewing the full list requires >=10K points, I think), all by the same user. These edits mostly didn't really follow the guidelines on writing good tag wikis, in particular they often didn't make clear which questions should have the particular tag. On the other hand, having a tag wiki may be considered better than having no tag wiki, at least unless the contents are too unreasonable. It happens that these tag wiki edits were accepted by some users (like myself, at least in most cases -- though I don't know whether this was the 'right' choice), and rejected by others. -- Any opinions?

Today [Apr 21 '16] and yesterday there were a considerable number of suggested edits to previously empty tag wikis and tag wiki excerpts (browse here; viewing the full list requires >=10K points, I think), all by the same user. These edits mostly didn't really follow the guidelines on writing good tag wikis, in particular they often didn't make clear which questions should have the particular tag. On the other hand, having a tag wiki may be considered better than having no tag wiki, at least unless the contents are too unreasonable. It happens that these tag wiki edits were accepted by some users (like myself, at least in most cases -- though I don't know whether this was the 'right' choice), and rejected by others. -- Any opinions?

Today and yesterday there were a considerable number of suggested edits to previously empty tag wikis and tag wiki excerpts (see here; viewing the full list requires >=10K points, I think), all by the same user. These edits mostly didn't really follow the guidelines on writing good tag wikis, in particular they often didn't make clear which questions should have the particular tag. On the other hand, having a tag wiki may be considered better than having no tag wiki, at least unless the contents are too unreasonable. It happens that these tag wiki edits were accepted by some users (like myself, at least in most cases -- though I don't know whether this was the 'right' choice), and rejected by others. -- Any opinions?

Today and yesterday there were a considerable number of suggested edits to previously empty tag wikis and tag wiki excerpts (see here; viewing the full list requires >=10K points, I think), all by the same user. These edits mostly didn't really follow the guidelines on writing good tag wikis, in particular they often didn't make clear which questions should have the particular tag. On the other hand, having a tag wiki may be considered better than having no tag wiki, at least unless the contents are too unreasonable. It happens that these tag wiki edits were accepted by some users (like myself, at least in most cases -- though I don't know whether this was the 'right' choice), and rejected by others. -- Any opinions?