Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

[REOPENED]

Parameterizing rotations of a cubeParameterizing rotations of a cube

was asked and answered, but I don't see a reason for closing it.

[REOPENED]

Parameterizing rotations of a cube

was asked and answered, but I don't see a reason for closing it.

[REOPENED]

Parameterizing rotations of a cube

was asked and answered, but I don't see a reason for closing it.

added 14 characters in body
Source Link
Stefan Kohl Mod
  • 19.6k
  • 3
  • 38
  • 66

[REOPENED]

Parameterizing rotations of a cube

was asked and answered, but I don't see a reason for closing it.

Parameterizing rotations of a cube

was asked and answered, but I don't see a reason for closing it.

[REOPENED]

Parameterizing rotations of a cube

was asked and answered, but I don't see a reason for closing it.

Source Link
Gil Kalai
  • 24.7k
  • 25
  • 31

Parameterizing rotations of a cube

was asked and answered, but I don't see a reason for closing it.

Post Made Community Wiki by Gil Kalai