Timeline for Should top mathoverflow threads get DOIs and be permanently archived?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2015 at 21:23 | comment | added | Josh | Sorry if we gave the impression that DOIs are some sort of magical tool--they are not. They do have value though and I thought it would be a nice step in the evolution of scholarly communication if Stack Exchange threads had them. | |
| Sep 14, 2015 at 21:23 | comment | added | Josh | Sorry, as new company we are relatively unknown. We are exploring new areas/services in scholarly publishing that major publishers are ignoring. From the looks of it, it appears as if you think such services are valuable. However, not with the help of The Winnower. Based on the feedback received it looks as if we will likely not be the ones to assign DOIs or archive the content. I do sincerely hope that a library does step up to do this as you mention if we are not to be the ones. | |
| Sep 14, 2015 at 21:13 | history | answered | Henry Cohn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |