Timeline for Why so heavy downvoting?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2015 at 18:21 | comment | added | Daniel Soltész | @Anixx This doesn't improve your question. | |
| Oct 22, 2015 at 13:54 | comment | added | Anixx | It seems that not only me used this approach for attemptin to prove Riemann hypothesis. I have just found this paper: arxiv.org/abs/1011.3352 which describes essentially the same thing (they use B for what I denote as $\omega_{+})$ | |
| Sep 11, 2015 at 13:27 | comment | added | Anixx | Why I should delete it if my approach on comparing sets is distinctly different from Cantor's? I just propose a different way of doing so. It is the main point. | |
| Sep 11, 2015 at 3:36 | comment | added | Anixx | @François G. Dorais no, this is the core of the idea | |
| Sep 10, 2015 at 23:26 | comment | added | François G. Dorais Mod | @Anixx: But you forgot to remove references to "Cantor's approach" in the first paragraph. All of these things are usually clear signs of crackpottery. In the future, I recommend avoiding that or, if necessary, putting it in a post-script rather than the first paragraph. | |
| Sep 10, 2015 at 15:56 | comment | added | Anixx | I removed the mention of the hypothesis, and now it got closed! | |
| Sep 10, 2015 at 1:58 | history | answered | Daniel Soltész | CC BY-SA 3.0 |