Timeline for Shall we have tea?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2018 at 16:52 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://tea.mathoverflow.net/ with http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.mathoverflow.net/ with https://meta.mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Dec 5, 2014 at 1:13 | answer | added | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 3, 2014 at 14:38 | answer | added | David E Speyer | timeline score: 10 | |
| Dec 2, 2014 at 20:54 | history | edited | user9072 |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 2, 2014 at 13:20 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | IMO login integration is not that important per se, but what is really helpful on the current meta is network-wide reply notification. | |
| Dec 2, 2014 at 12:47 | answer | added | user9072 | timeline score: 10 | |
| Dec 2, 2014 at 2:41 | comment | added | Kim Morrison Mod | I disagree with the need for a voting mechanism, although Discourse does provide a "liking" mechanism. I would be sad if the desire for complete login integration prevented us from even considering other options. It is possible that Discourse's "single-sign on" plugin would allow authenticating via MathOverflow, but I'm not sure yet. | |
| Dec 2, 2014 at 2:38 | answer | added | Kim MorrisonMod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Dec 2, 2014 at 1:52 | answer | added | The Masked Avenger | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 2, 2014 at 0:33 | answer | added | Joel David Hamkins | timeline score: 29 | |
| Dec 1, 2014 at 23:31 | comment | added | Stefan Kohl Mod | I think independent of what the exact format for meta is, it is important that it is integrated well with the main site -- i.e. in particular that no separate account is needed. Also I think meta should support a means of expressing agreement / disagreement in the form of votes as it does now. | |
| Dec 1, 2014 at 22:15 | history | asked | Kim MorrisonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |