Timeline for What about the question "does Grothendieck have any pseudonymous paper"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Jun 21, 2015 at 14:27 | answer | added | user75241 | timeline score: 9 | |
May 13, 2014 at 21:16 | comment | added | Todd Trimble Mod | I put a historical lock on the question. As justification, I feel that most of the criteria listed here -- meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126587/… -- were met (it was in the middle of a reopen-delete war when I applied the lock). But another major consideration was the history of the OP which in my opinion has been highly problematic; I thought it would be best to freeze the controversy where it is (where it now becomes archival) and move on. We can of course still discuss this action. | |
May 12, 2014 at 13:34 | answer | added | Brendan McKay | timeline score: 7 | |
May 9, 2014 at 16:14 | history | edited | Joël | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 19 characters in body
|
May 9, 2014 at 16:05 | comment | added | user9072 | @Konrad OP was never edited. Whatever the reason it can hardly been my answer. | |
May 9, 2014 at 15:43 | comment | added | Pierre-Yves Gaillard | @Konrad - Dear Konrad: Thanks! I still hope Joël will edit his post... | |
May 9, 2014 at 15:36 | comment | added | user45939 | @Pierre-YvesGaillard quid posted and deleted an answer here. I think Joël's sentence is about quid's answer. | |
May 9, 2014 at 15:19 | comment | added | Pierre-Yves Gaillard | Dear Joël: Didn't you forget to end the sentence starting with "On the other hand,"? | |
May 9, 2014 at 15:10 | answer | added | Leo Alonso | timeline score: -4 | |
May 9, 2014 at 14:52 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | I don't really see the point of the question, and consider it a little creepy. If a mathematician wants to contribute anonymously, they should be allowed to contribute anonymously. Otherwise we should consider it okay to ask MO questions like "what is the real name of quid?" | |
May 9, 2014 at 14:49 | comment | added | user45939 | I think it is better to let the question remain open for receiving any possible answers in future. Who knows who will see it and what they have to tell us? | |
May 9, 2014 at 13:49 | answer | added | Joël | timeline score: 17 | |
May 9, 2014 at 11:36 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | I think it is sensationalist and akin to the crowds following Brian Cohen around crying "he has given us a sign!... he has given us a shoe!" | |
May 8, 2014 at 20:46 | history | asked | Joël | CC BY-SA 3.0 |